MHB How to compare race times from one race to another race?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike Licata
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compare Race
Mike Licata
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
My son competed in a race over the weekend, and we are trying to figure out how he did overall compared to kids in similar races around the country. I am not very good in math, but I want to help him. Can this/ should this be done as a percentile? How? Other thoughts about how to approach this problem? Ideally, he wants to know, what place would he have taken (or what is his percentile) if all the racers had competed in together.

He was in race #1. There were 846 racers. He finished 315 overall, and in 39th place for his age bracket (there were 88 racers in his age bracket).

In race #2, there were 1,789 racers. Considering his time, he would have finished 19th in his age bracket (there were 174 racers in his age bracket)

In race #3, there were 4,768 racers. Considering his time, he would have finished 46th in his age bracket (there were 528 racers in his age bracket).

In race #4, there were 898 racers. Considering his time, he would have finished 70th in his age bracket (there were 121 racers in his age bracket).

In race #5, there were 178 racers. Considering his time, he would have finished 23rd in his age bracket (there were 28 racers in his age bracket).

Any help/thoughts would be really appreciated!
Mike Licata
Va Beach
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Mike Licata said:
My son competed in a race over the weekend, and we are trying to figure out how he did overall compared to kids in similar races around the country. I am not very good in math, but I want to help him. Can this/ should this be done as a percentile? How? Other thoughts about how to approach this problem? Ideally, he wants to know, what place would he have taken (or what is his percentile) if all the racers had competed in together.

He was in race #1. There were 846 racers. He finished 315 overall, and in 39th place for his age bracket (there were 88 racers in his age bracket).

In race #2, there were 1,789 racers. Considering his time, he would have finished 19th in his age bracket (there were 174 racers in his age bracket)

In race #3, there were 4,768 racers. Considering his time, he would have finished 46th in his age bracket (there were 528 racers in his age bracket).

In race #4, there were 898 racers. Considering his time, he would have finished 70th in his age bracket (there were 121 racers in his age bracket).

In race #5, there were 178 racers. Considering his time, he would have finished 23rd in his age bracket (there were 28 racers in his age bracket).

Any help/thoughts would be really appreciated!
Mike Licata
Va Beach

Hi Mike Licata! Welcome to MHB!

Suppose everyone had competed in one big race.
And suppose all racers are different and only compete once (that may not actually be true though, since "good" racers may well compete more often).
Then from the first 87 racers in his age bracket, excluding your son, 38 would presumably end higher then him.
From the second 173 racers, 18 would have ended higher.
And so on.

In total 38 + 18 + 45 + 69 + 22 = 192 racers in his age bracket would have ended higher on a total of 1 + 87 + 173 + 527 + 120 + 27 = 935.
That is, he would take position 193 out of 935 positions or 193 / 935 = 20.6%.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top