How to Compute charge ##Q## of a particular state in free Dirac field

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pouramat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
AI Thread Summary
To compute the charge of the state represented by $$Qa_{p1}^{r \dagger}a_{p2}^{s \dagger} b_{p3}^{t \dagger}$$ in a free Dirac field, one must utilize anti-commutation relations due to the fermionic nature of the Dirac field. The goal is to manipulate the operators so that annihilation operators are moved to the right, acting on the vacuum state, which results in zero. The relevant anti-commutation relations indicate that each a-particle contributes a charge of +1, while each b-particle contributes -1. The explicit calculation serves as a verification of this intuitive understanding of the charge of the state. Ultimately, this exercise reinforces the principles of quantization in fermionic fields.
Pouramat
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
For a free Dirac field, how can I explicitly compute the charge ##Q## of the state ##a_{p1}^{r \dagger}a_{p2}^{s \dagger} b_{p3}^{t \dagger}|0>##.
Relevant Equations
The operator $Q$ is :
\begin{equation}
Q = \int \frac{d^3 p}{(2 \pi)^3} \Sigma_s \bigg(a_p^{s \dagger}a_p^s-b_p^ {s \dagger} b_p^s \bigg)
\end{equation}
suppose I should evaluate $$Qa_{p1}^{r \dagger}a_{p2}^{s \dagger} b_{p3}^{t \dagger}$$ I get lost in the commutator relation. Any help?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: You need, of course anti-commutator relations, because the Dirac field must be quantized as fermions. The goal is to bring annihilation operators to the right, so that it's acting on the vacuum state, giving 0. Note that for arbitrary operators
$$[\hat{A},\hat{B} \hat{C}]=\{\hat{A},\hat{B} \} \hat{C}-\hat{B} \{\hat{A},\hat{C} \}.$$
Further you have
$$\{\hat{a}_p^{s},\hat{a}_{p'}^{s' \dagger} \}=(2 \pi)^3 \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}-\vec{p}') \delta_{ss'}$$
and similar for the b's. All other anticommutators vanish.

It's also intuitively clear, what the charge of this state is, since obviously any a-particle carries a charge of +1 and any b-particle (the anti-particle of the a-particle) carries charge -1. But it's a good exercise to verify this by the explicit calculation.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta Prime
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top