How to construct a map from S^2 to RP^2 with covering time being unity?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wdlang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Map Time Unity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the construction of a map from the 2-sphere (S²) to the real projective plane (RP²) with a specific property referred to as "covering time being unity." Participants explore the implications of this property, the relationship between homotopy groups, and the nature of mappings between these two manifolds.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using stereographic projection to construct the map but encounters issues with the mapping of infinity to the circle in RP².
  • Several participants express confusion regarding the term "covering time being unity" and seek clarification on its meaning.
  • Another participant relates the concept to the homotopy group, noting that they want to construct an element with covering time equal to 1.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between covering time and the winding number, with some suggesting that it may be more accurately described as the degree of the map.
  • One participant points out that the degree is only defined modulo 2 for non-orientable surfaces like RP².
  • A later reply discusses the projection map from S² to RP² and its role as a generator of the homotopy group π₂(RP²), indicating that this map is indeed relevant to the discussion.
  • Another participant acknowledges the depth of understanding shown by others and expresses a desire to further contemplate the topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the concepts discussed, particularly around the definitions and implications of covering time and degree. There is no consensus on the initial question, and multiple competing views remain regarding the nature of the mapping and its properties.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for clarity on terms like "covering time" and "degree," indicating that these concepts may depend on specific definitions and interpretations within the context of homotopy theory.

wdlang
Messages
306
Reaction score
0
it is easy to construct a map from S^2 to S^2, with covering time being unity

but how to do the similar task on the projected manifold RP^2=S^2/Z_2?

i tried to use the stereographical trick

the points on the lower half semisphere are projected onto the plane

the problem is that the infinity point on the plane is mapped to the circle, which is not a single point on RP^2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is not clear to me what you are trying to get. What is a "map with covering time being unity"?
 
quasar987 said:
It is not clear to me what you are trying to get. What is a "map with covering time being unity"?

we know the homotopy group

\pi_2(RP^2)=Z

i want to construct an element with the covering time being 1
 
Still don't get it. An element of \pi_2(RP^2) is the homotopy class of a map S²-->RP². What is this buisiness about "covering time"?
 
quasar987 said:
Still don't get it. An element of \pi_2(RP^2) is the homotopy class of a map S²-->RP². What is this buisiness about "covering time"?

you can call it the winding number
 
quasar987 said:
You mean the degree?!? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degree_of_a_continuous_mapping

But then RP² is non orientable...so how are you defining the degree of map S²-->RP²?

Afaik, the degree is only defined mod 2 in this case.

i do not know this at all

but could we construct a mapping in the class of [1]?

if we use the identity map to map s2 to s2 and then project to rp2

i guess the mapping is in the class of [2].
 
So now it seems like you're talking about finding a map f:S²-->RP² that is a generator of \pi_2(RP^2)=Z.

But that is easy given the usually way of determing \pi_2(RP^2).

Namely, under the projection (or quotient) map pi:S²-->RP², S² is a fiber bundle over RP^2 of fiber S^0={-1,1}. So there is a long exact sequence of homotopy groups which around pi_2 looks like:

0=\pi_2(S^0)\rightarrow \pi_2(S^2)\stackrel{\pi_*}{\rightarrow} \pi_2(RP^2)\rightarrow \pi_1(S^0)=0

So \pi_* is an isomorphism. And what does it do? It takes the class of the identity map [id:S^2\rightarrow S^2] (which is a generator of \pi_2(S^2)=Z)to the class of the projection map [\pi:S^2\rightarrow RP^2].

So the map that like you said is "the identity map to map s2 to s2 and then project to rp2", which is just the projection map pi:S²-->RP² is in fact a generator of \pi_2(RP^2)=Z.
 
quasar987 said:
So now it seems like you're talking about finding a map f:S²-->RP² that is a generator of \pi_2(RP^2)=Z.

But that is easy given the usually way of determing \pi_2(RP^2).

Namely, under the projection (or quotient) map pi:S²-->RP², S² is a fiber bundle over RP^2 of fiber S^0={-1,1}. So there is a long exact sequence of homotopy groups which around pi_2 looks like:

0=\pi_2(S^0)\rightarrow \pi_2(S^2)\stackrel{\pi_*}{\rightarrow} \pi_2(RP^2)\rightarrow \pi_1(S^0)=0

So \pi_* is an isomorphism. And what does it do? It takes the class of the identity map [id:S^2\rightarrow S^2] (which is a generator of \pi_2(S^2)=Z)to the class of the projection map [\pi:S^2\rightarrow RP^2].

So the map that like you said is "the identity map to map s2 to s2 and then project to rp2", which is just the projection map pi:S²-->RP² is in fact a generator of \pi_2(RP^2)=Z.

it seems that you have a profound awesome understanding of the subject

i will think of it
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K