How to correctly type "-i.e." in LaTeX?

  • Context: LaTeX 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Haorong Wu
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the correct formatting of the term "-i.e." in LaTeX, particularly in the context of manuscript submissions and editorial modifications. Participants explore various ways to type this term correctly, considering both LaTeX syntax and editorial preferences.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Debate/contested, Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that their manuscript was edited to replace ",i.e." with "-i.e.," and seeks clarification on how to type it correctly in LaTeX.
  • Another participant suggests that it is not necessary to use LaTeX for "i.e." and provides a method using four hashtags.
  • Several participants propose different LaTeX commands, such as \text{,i.e.,} and \text{-i.e.,}, while expressing confusion over the original post.
  • One participant suggests that communicating directly with the editor may be more effective than seeking advice in the forum.
  • A suggestion is made to create a macro for "i.e." to facilitate easier formatting throughout the document.
  • Another participant points out a minor formatting issue regarding spacing after the first comma in the term.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the correct formatting and usage of "-i.e." in LaTeX, with no consensus reached on a single correct approach.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions about the specific requirements of the editor and the potential variations in formatting preferences.

Haorong Wu
Messages
419
Reaction score
90
Last year, I submitted a manuscript to PRD. I noticed that all ",i.e.," are modified into "-i.e.," by the editor.

Therefore, in my recent manuscript, I typed "---i.e.," in LaTeX. However, all the "-i.e.," are modified again into "-i.e.," by the editor. I could not distinguish the difference between them.

So, how should I correctly type "-i.e.," in LaTeX? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean "Id est"? What software are you using?
Anyhow, at PF it is not needed LaTeX to type ie; but in case you needed, it should be four #, and ie in the middle; ie, ##ie##..
Hope it helps.
 
\text{,i.e.,} is one way, which looks like this:
##\text{,i.e.,}##

or did you want ##\text{-i.e.,}##? Your post was a bit confusing about that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby and mcastillo356
DaveE said:
\text{,i.e.,} is one way, which looks like this:
##\text{,i.e.,}##

or did you want ##\text{-i.e.,}##? Your post was a bit confusing about that.
Very sorry for the confusion.

In my manuscript last year, I typed ",i.e." in LaTeX. However, in the proofs, I notice that they are all replaced by "-i.e.," by the editor, as in the following figure.
1.webp


Therefore, in my recent manuscript, I typed "---i.e.," in LaTeX. However, in the proofs, they are again corrected by the editor, as in the following figure. I could not tell what was done by the editor.
2.webp


Maybe I should type "--i.e.,"?
 
Haorong Wu said:
Maybe I should type "--i.e.,"?
Maybe you should type "\text{,i.e.}" ?
 
Haorong Wu said:
Maybe I should type "--i.e.,"?
I would suggest just communicating with that editor to ask how they want it done. That seems like a more productive path compared to asking us. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mcastillo356
Make a macro, e.g.,
\newcommand{\ie}{\textit{i.e.}}

It will be easier to make a global change throughout the document.
Of course, you can modify it as you wish... or as the editor wishes.
 
DaveE said:
\text{,i.e.,} is one way, which looks like this:
##\text{,i.e.,}##
Minor nit: there should be a space after the first comma, i.e., ##\text{, i.e.,} \dots##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dextercioby

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K