How to correctly type "-i.e." in LaTeX?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Haorong Wu
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the correct formatting of "-i.e." in LaTeX manuscripts, highlighting confusion over how editors modify the text. The original poster experienced issues with their manuscript where ",i.e." was changed to "-i.e." by the editor, leading to uncertainty about the proper LaTeX input. Suggestions include using "\text{,i.e.}" or creating a macro for consistency. Participants recommend directly communicating with the editor for clarity on formatting preferences. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of adhering to specific editorial guidelines in LaTeX submissions.
Haorong Wu
Messages
419
Reaction score
90
Last year, I submitted a manuscript to PRD. I noticed that all ",i.e.," are modified into "-i.e.," by the editor.

Therefore, in my recent manuscript, I typed "---i.e.," in LaTeX. However, all the "-i.e.," are modified again into "-i.e.," by the editor. I could not distinguish the difference between them.

So, how should I correctly type "-i.e.," in LaTeX? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean "Id est"? What software are you using?
Anyhow, at PF it is not needed LaTeX to type ie; but in case you needed, it should be four #, and ie in the middle; ie, ##ie##..
Hope it helps.
 
\text{,i.e.,} is one way, which looks like this:
##\text{,i.e.,}##

or did you want ##\text{-i.e.,}##? Your post was a bit confusing about that.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby and mcastillo356
DaveE said:
\text{,i.e.,} is one way, which looks like this:
##\text{,i.e.,}##

or did you want ##\text{-i.e.,}##? Your post was a bit confusing about that.
Very sorry for the confusion.

In my manuscript last year, I typed ",i.e." in LaTeX. However, in the proofs, I notice that they are all replaced by "-i.e.," by the editor, as in the following figure.
1.webp


Therefore, in my recent manuscript, I typed "---i.e.," in LaTeX. However, in the proofs, they are again corrected by the editor, as in the following figure. I could not tell what was done by the editor.
2.webp


Maybe I should type "--i.e.,"?
 
Haorong Wu said:
Maybe I should type "--i.e.,"?
Maybe you should type "\text{,i.e.}" ?
 
Haorong Wu said:
Maybe I should type "--i.e.,"?
I would suggest just communicating with that editor to ask how they want it done. That seems like a more productive path compared to asking us. :wink:
 
  • Like
Likes mcastillo356
Make a macro, e.g.,
\newcommand{\ie}{\textit{i.e.}}

It will be easier to make a global change throughout the document.
Of course, you can modify it as you wish... or as the editor wishes.
 
DaveE said:
\text{,i.e.,} is one way, which looks like this:
##\text{,i.e.,}##
Minor nit: there should be a space after the first comma, i.e., ##\text{, i.e.,} \dots##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes dextercioby

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K