How do you define a set without using set builder notation? For example, let's say that I want to define set S as:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

S={x ∈ ℕ ∣ 0<x<5}

Then

S={1,2,3,4}

However, suppose that I wanted to define S without set-builder notation, as below?

∀x(x ∈ ℕ ^ 0<x<5 ⟺ x∈S )

Would these two statements be equivalent, or is there something else provided in the set builder notation that I am missing?

Thanks.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# How to define a set without set builder notation

Loading...

Similar Threads - define without builder | Date |
---|---|

A Defining the membership relation in set theory? | Sep 27, 2017 |

I Correlation Limits without Probability | Nov 5, 2016 |

What defines probability | Jan 9, 2016 |

The limit of random variable is not defined | Nov 16, 2015 |

Defining things in logical statements | Nov 26, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**