MHB How to derive a recurrence relation from explicit form

find_the_fun
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
I am given a formula in explicit form and as a recurrence relation. It is asked to derive the recurrence relation from the explicit form. How is this done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the closed, or explicit, form?
 
closed: [math]P_N=\frac{\frac{A^N}{N!}}{\sum\limits_{x=0}^N \frac{A^x}{x!}}[/math]

recurrence: [math]P_i = \frac{A p_{i-1}}{i+A p_{i-1}}[/math] for i=1 to N
 
Last edited:
I was hoping you would post a closed form solution in the form:

$$A_n=\sum_{k=0}^m\left(c_kr_k^n\right)$$

Leading to a linear recurrence.

I will have to defer here to someone more knowledgeable in this field. :D
 
find_the_fun said:
recurrence: [math]P_i = \frac{A p_{i-1}}{i+A p_{i-1}}[/math] for i=1 to N
I assume $P_{i-1}$ should be written with a capital $P$ in the right-hand side.

I'll have to think more how to derive the recurrence formula, but it is easy to prove it once it is known: just substitute the closed formula into it. It is probably easier to work with
\[
\frac{1}{P_i}=\frac{i}{AP_{i-1}}+1.
\]
 
Can this be done using nothing but algebraic manipulation? If so, I think I found a way.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top