How to Derive Pauli's Equation from Dirac's Equation in a Weak Field?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick280857
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dirac Pauli
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on deriving Pauli's equation from Dirac's equation in the weak field regime. The user, Vivek, substitutes a two-component spinor into the Dirac equation, resulting in two coupled equations. By applying the weak field approximation where 2m >> eA0, the equations are simplified, leading to an almost Pauli equation. The conversation highlights the importance of neglecting certain terms to achieve the final form of Pauli's equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dirac's equation and its implications in quantum mechanics.
  • Familiarity with Pauli's equation and its derivation.
  • Knowledge of weak field approximations in quantum field theory.
  • Basic concepts of spinors and their representation in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Pauli's equation from Dirac's equation in detail.
  • Explore weak field approximations in quantum electrodynamics.
  • Review L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifgarbagez's "Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 4 Quantum Electrodynamics".
  • Learn about the implications of neglecting terms in quantum mechanical equations.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers focusing on quantum electrodynamics and particle physics.

maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Hi,

I'm trying to get to Pauli's equation from Dirac's equation in the weak field regime. Specifically, if I substitute

\psi = \left(\begin{array}{cc}\chi \\ \varphi \end{array}\right)

into the Dirac equation, I get two coupled equations

i\frac{\partial\chi}{\partial t} = (\sigma\cdot\pi)\varphi + (m + eA^{0})\chi
i\frac{\partial\varphi}{\partial t} = (\sigma\cdot\pi)\chi + (m + eA^{0})\varphi

where \pi = \boldsymbol{p} - e\boldsymbol{A}.

Substituting \chi = e^{-imt}X and \varphi = e^{-imt}\Phi, we get

i\frac{\partial X}{\partial t} = (\sigma\cdot\pi)\Phi + eA^{0}X ------- (*)
i\frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial t} = (\sigma\cdot\pi)X - (2m - eA^{0})\Phi

In the weak field regime, 2m >> eA^{0}, so the second of the last two equations becomes

i\frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial t} = (\sigma\cdot\pi)X - 2m\Phi -------- (**)

Now, differentiating (**) wrt time to decouple (*) and (**) introduces a second derivative term in the 'almost Pauli' equation :-p

i\frac{\partial^{2}\Phi}{\partial t^2} = (\sigma\cdot\pi)^2\Phi - 2im\frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial t}

How does one get Pauli's equation from this?

Do I also have to make an explicit nonrelativistic approximation:

E = \sqrt{p^2 + m^2} \approx m

so that exp(-imt) = exp(-iEt)

?

Thanks in advance.

Cheers
Vivek.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
In the equation (**) you should also neglect the first derivative term:

<br /> 0 = (\sigma\cdot\pi)X - 2m\Phi<br /> ------- (**')

See also:
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifgarbagez, Course of Theoretical Physics,
Vol. 4 Quantum Electrodynamics, section 33
 
Maxim Zh said:
In the equation (**) you should also neglect the first derivative term:

<br /> 0 = (\sigma\cdot\pi)X - 2m\Phi<br /> ------- (**')

See also:
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifgarbagez, Course of Theoretical Physics,
Vol. 4 Quantum Electrodynamics, section 33

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K