How to Derive Pauli's Equation from Dirac's Equation in a Weak Field?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick280857
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dirac Pauli
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on deriving Pauli's equation from Dirac's equation within the context of a weak field regime. Participants explore the mathematical substitutions and approximations necessary for this derivation, including the implications of nonrelativistic limits.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a method to derive Pauli's equation by substituting a specific form of the wave function into the Dirac equation, resulting in coupled equations.
  • The same participant proposes a nonrelativistic approximation where the energy is approximated as E ≈ m, questioning whether this is necessary for the derivation.
  • Another participant suggests neglecting the first derivative term in the equations to simplify the derivation, referencing a specific theoretical physics text for support.
  • A repeated suggestion emphasizes the need to disregard the first derivative term in the context of the derivation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the best approach to derive Pauli's equation, as participants present differing views on which terms to neglect and the necessity of certain approximations.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the weak field regime and the implications of neglecting certain terms, which may affect the validity of the derivation.

maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Hi,

I'm trying to get to Pauli's equation from Dirac's equation in the weak field regime. Specifically, if I substitute

\psi = \left(\begin{array}{cc}\chi \\ \varphi \end{array}\right)

into the Dirac equation, I get two coupled equations

i\frac{\partial\chi}{\partial t} = (\sigma\cdot\pi)\varphi + (m + eA^{0})\chi
i\frac{\partial\varphi}{\partial t} = (\sigma\cdot\pi)\chi + (m + eA^{0})\varphi

where \pi = \boldsymbol{p} - e\boldsymbol{A}.

Substituting \chi = e^{-imt}X and \varphi = e^{-imt}\Phi, we get

i\frac{\partial X}{\partial t} = (\sigma\cdot\pi)\Phi + eA^{0}X ------- (*)
i\frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial t} = (\sigma\cdot\pi)X - (2m - eA^{0})\Phi

In the weak field regime, 2m >> eA^{0}, so the second of the last two equations becomes

i\frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial t} = (\sigma\cdot\pi)X - 2m\Phi -------- (**)

Now, differentiating (**) wrt time to decouple (*) and (**) introduces a second derivative term in the 'almost Pauli' equation :-p

i\frac{\partial^{2}\Phi}{\partial t^2} = (\sigma\cdot\pi)^2\Phi - 2im\frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial t}

How does one get Pauli's equation from this?

Do I also have to make an explicit nonrelativistic approximation:

E = \sqrt{p^2 + m^2} \approx m

so that exp(-imt) = exp(-iEt)

?

Thanks in advance.

Cheers
Vivek.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
In the equation (**) you should also neglect the first derivative term:

<br /> 0 = (\sigma\cdot\pi)X - 2m\Phi<br /> ------- (**')

See also:
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifgarbagez, Course of Theoretical Physics,
Vol. 4 Quantum Electrodynamics, section 33
 
Maxim Zh said:
In the equation (**) you should also neglect the first derivative term:

<br /> 0 = (\sigma\cdot\pi)X - 2m\Phi<br /> ------- (**')

See also:
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifgarbagez, Course of Theoretical Physics,
Vol. 4 Quantum Electrodynamics, section 33

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K