How to derive the equation with velocity and acceleration?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the acceleration of car B needed for it to be side by side with car A at t = 4 seconds, calculated to be -2.5 m/s². At this acceleration, the cars only intersect once. If car B's acceleration is increased (less negative), it will intersect car A twice, while a decrease in acceleration results in no intersections. The equations derived for the positions of both cars confirm these findings, illustrating the relationship between acceleration and the frequency of intersections. Overall, the analysis shows how varying acceleration affects the motion of the two cars.
Eclair_de_XII
Messages
1,082
Reaction score
91

Homework Statement


"Cars A and B move in the same direction in adjacent lanes. The position x of car A is given in Fig. 2-27, from time t = 0 to t = 7 s. The figure's vertical scaling is set by xs = 32 m. At t = 0, car B is at x = 0, with a velocity of 12 m/s and a negative constant acceleration aB. (a) What must aB be such that the cars are (momentarily) side by side (momentarily at the same value of x) at t = 4 s? (b) For that value of aB, how many times are the cars side by side? How many times will the cars be side by side if the magnitude of acceleration aB is (d) more than and (e) less than the answer to part (a)?"

t = 4 s
t(4) = 28 m
vB(0) = 12 m/s

Homework Equations


x - x0 = v0t + ½at2

The Attempt at a Solution


28 m - 0 m = (12 m/s)(4 s) + ½a(4 s)2
-20 m = ½a(16 s2)
-40 m = a(16 s2)
a = -2.5 m/s2

Right now, I'm working out part (d) and (e), assuming that for a = -2.5 m/s2, car B crosses car A's path only once. I'm trying to do this by way of deriving equations. For car A, I've derived an equation that describes its path: f(x) = 2x + 20. For car B, I'm trying to figure out how to express its motion (given by v0 = 12 m/s and a = -2.5 m/s2). This way, I can figure out how many times car B crosses car A, just by graphing the function for car B, and seeing how many intersections there are. I'm thinking the first coefficient of this equation would be f(x) = -2.5x2 + 12x+ C... but I wouldn't be sure how to derive the rest of the equation. Here's a picture of the graph from which I derived my first function:

http://i.imgur.com/O80znQM.jpg
upload_2016-2-19_23-17-10.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Eclair_de_XII said:
f(x) = -2.5x2+ 12x+ C...
Compare this with s=s0+v0t+(1/2)at2. What have you forgotten?
 
Let's see...

f(x) = s
x = t
A = a
B = v0
C = s0

so (assuming s0 = 0):

f(x) = -1.25x2 + 12x

Just to confirm...

28 = -1.25(4)2 + 12(4)
28 = 48 - 20
28 = 28

(b)
-1.25x2 + 12x = 2x + 20
-1.25x2 + 10x - 20 = 0
x2 - 8x + 16 = 0
x = ±4

So we can confirm that it's only once that car B matches car A at this acceleration.

(d)
At an arbitrarily higher acceleration...

-1x2 + 12x = 2x + 20
-1x2 + 10x - 20 = 0
x2 - 10x + 20 = 0

x = 5±√(5)

There are two points at which car B matches car A.

(e)
At an arbitrarily lower acceleration...

-1.26x2 + 12x = 2x + 20
-1.26x2 + 10x - 20 = 0
x2 - 7.397x + 15.873 = 0

The solution is imaginary, so at any lower acceleration, the cars do not cross paths.
 
Eclair_de_XII said:
Let's see...

f(x) = s
x = t
A = a
B = v0
C = s0

so (assuming s0 = 0):

f(x) = -1.25x2 + 12x

Just to confirm...

28 = -1.25(4)2 + 12(4)
28 = 48 - 20
28 = 28

(b)
-1.25x2 + 12x = 2x + 20
-1.25x2 + 10x - 20 = 0
x2 - 8x + 16 = 0
x = ±4

So we can confirm that it's only once that car B matches car A at this acceleration.

(d)
At an arbitrarily higher acceleration...

-1x2 + 12x = 2x + 20
-1x2 + 10x - 20 = 0
x2 - 10x + 20 = 0

x = 5±√(5)

There are two points at which car B matches car A.

(e)
At an arbitrarily lower acceleration...

-1.26x2 + 12x = 2x + 20
-1.26x2 + 10x - 20 = 0
x2 - 7.397x + 15.873 = 0

The solution is imaginary, so at any lower acceleration, the cars do not cross paths.
That all looks right, except that I'm not sure you are entitled to choose specific higher and lower accelerations. The way I read the question, you should show that any higher (less negative) acceleration they meet twice, etc.
 
haruspex said:
The way I read the question, you should show that any higher (less negative) acceleration they meet twice, etc.

Okay, I'm just going to do this very abstract-like, and you can tell me if I'm wrong or not.

Let a = arbitrary constant > 0

##(d)##
##(-1.25 + a)x^2+10x-20=0##
##x=\frac{-10±\sqrt{100+80(-1.25+a)}}{2(-1.25+a)}##
##x=\frac{-10±\sqrt{80a}}{2(-1.25+a)}##
##x=\frac{-10±4\sqrt{5a}}{2(-1.25+a)}##
##x=\frac{-5±2\sqrt{5a}}{(-1.25+a)}##

So that produces two distinct instances where cars A and B run into each other. And now for (e), which is basically the same thing, except you're subtracting a.

Let a = arbitrary constant > 0

##(e)##
##(-1.25 - a)x^2+10x-20=0##
##x=\frac{-10±\sqrt{100+80(-1.25-a)}}{2(-1.25-a)}##
##x=\frac{-10±\sqrt{-80a}}{2(-1.25+a)}##
##x=\frac{-5±2\sqrt{-5a}}{(-1.25+a)}##

Therefore, since there are no solutions to the system of equations for cars A and B, with an arbitrarily lower acceleration, they do not coincide at any point.
 
Oh, damn, I just realized; I would have to replace (-1.25±a) with [(-2.5±a)/(2)] or (-1.25±a/2).

Well, whatever. I'm too lazy to fix it, and since (a/2) wouldn't affect the signs under the radicals, I guess I'm okay.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K