How to detect redundant equation from a system of nonlinear equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gohkgohkgohk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nonlinear System
Click For Summary
Detecting redundant equations in a system of nonlinear equations involves assessing linear independence, meaning one equation cannot be represented by others. There is no universal method for identifying redundancy, but the Jacobian matrix can provide insights for differentiable nonlinear equations. A key point is that the Jacobian being zero across an open set indicates functional dependence among the equations, while a zero Jacobian at a single point is insufficient for conclusions. The discussion highlights the complexity of this topic, suggesting that algebraic geometry may offer practical approaches despite its abstract nature. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing systems of nonlinear equations effectively.
gohkgohkgohk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
How to detect redundant equation from a system of nonlinear equation?
It means how to find out a system of nonlinear equation is "linear independence"?
One equation from the system can not be represented by the others in the system of nonlinear equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome gohkgohkgohk .
I'm afraid there's no general method of spotting a redundant equation from a set. The Jacobian helps a liitle if you have differentiable non-linear equations.
 
Hi Eynstone, could you share more details on how to determine the redundant equation using Jacobian? My suspection is even its Jacobian matrix has redundant rows, the non-linear equation system may not have redundant equations.
 
I checked the section on functional dependence from Gerald Folland's Advanced Calculus.

There it says, if you consider on open set U, then

Jacobian is zero throughout U if and only if the functions have some (possibly various) functional dependence(s) throughout U.

So it's not enough for the Jacobian to vanish at a single point, calculus needs an open set to draw conclusions. To deal with single points, I think is part of the practicality of the subject algebraic geometry, which more or less deals with systems of polynomials, as far as I know, but looks like a very abstract subject.
 
Last edited:
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 92 ·
4
Replies
92
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
961
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K