How to Determine Absolute Magnitude

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ckirmser
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absolute Magnitude
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining a star's absolute magnitude, essential for classifying stars with incomplete data. The user seeks a general formula that does not rely on apparent magnitude, which requires distance measurements. They conclude that absolute magnitude can be derived by using the apparent magnitude at a fixed distance of ten parsecs. This method allows for better classification of stars, such as correcting entries from A0 to A0II based on calculated absolute magnitudes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stellar classification (e.g., A0, M4.5, K)
  • Familiarity with absolute and apparent magnitude concepts
  • Basic knowledge of astronomical distances (e.g., parsecs)
  • Experience with statistical methods for averaging data
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the formula for calculating absolute magnitude from apparent magnitude
  • Explore stellar classification systems and their associated absolute magnitudes
  • Learn about the significance of distances in astronomy, particularly parsecs
  • Investigate methods for estimating stellar characteristics from incomplete data
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysics students, and researchers involved in stellar classification and characteristics analysis will benefit from this discussion.

ckirmser
Messages
105
Reaction score
3
Hello, all.

I'm trying to find an equation to determine a star's absolute magnitude in order to populate a table of stellar characteristics.

Unfortunately, every formula I've run across requires a star's apparent magnitude and that requires knowing how far the star is from the observer.

But, I need a general case formula.

Basically, I have a star catalog, but many of the stars do not have a complete classification; perhaps they are listed as AIII, or M4.5, or, simply K. I'm going to provide a "best guess" at the full classification, by taking the parts that are known, and using the absolute magnitude to finesse the value.

For example, suppose I have a star listed as A0 with an absolute magnitude of -3.36.

By the data I already have, A0Ib has an absolute magnitude of -5.3, A0II has -3.4 and A0III has -0.3.

Using averages to get the boundary between each entry - not perfect, but it's the best I have - I find that -3.36 falls within the boundary of -4.35 to -1.85 for an A0II star. So, I correct the incomplete entry to A0II.

The problem is with star classes for which the table is incomplete; like classes C, S, WN, etc. I have the temperatures for these classes and their radii in solar units, but not their magnitudes.

Any thoughts?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
OK, I think I've found the answer. From further reading, I've found that absolute magnitude is simply the apparent magnitude at ten parsecs. So, I just plug in that constant distance to the formulas I've found.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K