How to Determine Masses in a Binary Star System?

Click For Summary
To determine the masses in a binary star system like Sirius, the ratio of the masses can be calculated using the distance ratio, yielding m_A/m_B = 2.146. The semimajor axis of the system, which is crucial for applying Kepler's third law, can be derived from the angular extent and the distance calculated using the parallax measurement. The distance to Sirius is approximately 2.6363 parsecs, which helps in converting the angular measurements into actual distances. The semimajor axis must be calculated rather than assumed, and it is essential for solving the mass equations. Understanding these relationships is key to accurately determining the masses of the stars in the binary system.
pierce15
Messages
313
Reaction score
2
Hello,

I wasn't sure whether I should post this is the homework section since it's technically a textbook problem, but I figured I'd get better responses here. The problem is as follows:

Sirius is a visual binary with a period of 49.94 years. Its measured parallax is .37931"## \pm ##.00158", and the angular extent of the semimajor axis of the reduced mass is 7.61". The ratio of the distances of Sirius A and B to the center of mass is ## a_A / a_B = .466 ##. Find the masses of the two stars, assuming that the motion is in the plane of the sky.

First, you can use the ratio to get ## m_A / m_B = 1/.466 = 2.146##. I'm pretty sure I next have to use the 7.61", but I don't know how. After that, I would have all the unknowns in Kepler's third except the masses, so I could solve the system. So how do I get the semimajor axis of the smaller star?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
piercebeatz said:
I wasn't sure whether I should post this is the homework section since it's technically a textbook problem, but I figured I'd get better responses here.
Textbook questions belong to the homework section. I moved it with a redirect in the original forum.

First, you can use the ratio to get ## m_A / m_B = 1/.466 = 2.146##.
Okay.
I'm pretty sure I next have to use the 7.61", but I don't know how.
This is related to the true semi-major axis of the system, if you know the distance. There is another parameter given that allows to calculate the distance.

So how do I get the semimajor axis of the smaller star?
Find the semi-major axis of the reduced mass first.
 
mfb said:
This is related to the true semi-major axis of the system, if you know the distance. There is another parameter given that allows to calculate the distance.

Using the parallactic angle yields ## d [pc] = 1/p" = 1/.37921 = 2.6363 pc##. Now what?

By the way, the "reduced mass" just refers to the star with lower mass, right?
 
Last edited:
piercebeatz said:
Using the parallactic angle yields ## d [pc] = 1/p" = 1/.37921 = 2.6363 pc##. Now what?
You got an angle (as seen from earth) and a distance...

By the way, the "reduced mass" just refers to the star with lower mass, right?
No.
 
Yeah, my bad... 7.61" = a / 2.636 pc ---> a = 3.00 E12 after converting 7.61" to rad and 2.636 to m. So is this the same a that goes in kepler's third equation? Or do I have to go back and use the semimajor axis ratio that I was given
 
So is this the same a that goes in kepler's third equation?
Should be. Check the link to the reduced mass.
Or do I have to go back and use the semimajor axis ratio that I was given
There was no given semi-major axis, you had to calculate it.
 
mfb said:
Should be. Check the link to the reduced mass.
There was no given semi-major axis, you had to calculate it.

Got it. Thank you very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K