How to Determine Masses in a Binary Star System?

pierce15
Messages
313
Reaction score
2
Hello,

I wasn't sure whether I should post this is the homework section since it's technically a textbook problem, but I figured I'd get better responses here. The problem is as follows:

Sirius is a visual binary with a period of 49.94 years. Its measured parallax is .37931"## \pm ##.00158", and the angular extent of the semimajor axis of the reduced mass is 7.61". The ratio of the distances of Sirius A and B to the center of mass is ## a_A / a_B = .466 ##. Find the masses of the two stars, assuming that the motion is in the plane of the sky.

First, you can use the ratio to get ## m_A / m_B = 1/.466 = 2.146##. I'm pretty sure I next have to use the 7.61", but I don't know how. After that, I would have all the unknowns in Kepler's third except the masses, so I could solve the system. So how do I get the semimajor axis of the smaller star?
 
piercebeatz said:
I wasn't sure whether I should post this is the homework section since it's technically a textbook problem, but I figured I'd get better responses here.
Textbook questions belong to the homework section. I moved it with a redirect in the original forum.

First, you can use the ratio to get ## m_A / m_B = 1/.466 = 2.146##.
Okay.
I'm pretty sure I next have to use the 7.61", but I don't know how.
This is related to the true semi-major axis of the system, if you know the distance. There is another parameter given that allows to calculate the distance.

So how do I get the semimajor axis of the smaller star?
Find the semi-major axis of the reduced mass first.
 
mfb said:
This is related to the true semi-major axis of the system, if you know the distance. There is another parameter given that allows to calculate the distance.

Using the parallactic angle yields ## d [pc] = 1/p" = 1/.37921 = 2.6363 pc##. Now what?

By the way, the "reduced mass" just refers to the star with lower mass, right?
 
Last edited:
piercebeatz said:
Using the parallactic angle yields ## d [pc] = 1/p" = 1/.37921 = 2.6363 pc##. Now what?
You got an angle (as seen from earth) and a distance...

By the way, the "reduced mass" just refers to the star with lower mass, right?
No.
 
Yeah, my bad... 7.61" = a / 2.636 pc ---> a = 3.00 E12 after converting 7.61" to rad and 2.636 to m. So is this the same a that goes in kepler's third equation? Or do I have to go back and use the semimajor axis ratio that I was given
 
So is this the same a that goes in kepler's third equation?
Should be. Check the link to the reduced mass.
Or do I have to go back and use the semimajor axis ratio that I was given
There was no given semi-major axis, you had to calculate it.
 
mfb said:
Should be. Check the link to the reduced mass.
There was no given semi-major axis, you had to calculate it.

Got it. Thank you very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K