erobz
Gold Member
- 4,454
- 1,841
It appears as though I underestimated the head loss from the damper.
https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/hvac-damper-pressure-loss-d_1873.html
In a 12 inch duct @ 1050 CFM, that's a damper face velocity ##\approx 3000 ~ \rm{\frac{ft}{min}}##.
According to the chart that's close to 1.5"WC loss for the damper. That would give us a total of ##\approx 6 + 0.5+1.5 = 8## "WC.
If your motor rpm is correct ( it is run off a VFD ), then it indicates the fan is performing as expected.
It's possible someone decided to overspeed the motor a bit to make up for missing the design spec (or underestimating it).
If this turns out to be the case, (probably) the most economical route is to get a larger motor and change gearing to match the desired rpm as opposed to a system redesign. You'll have to check the ROR for each option.
$$ H(1300) \approx \frac{8}{1050^2}1300^2 = 12.3~\rm{WC}$$
I'd give that a 10% safety factor...so spec the motor hp/rpm about 13" WC @ 1300 CFM.
https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/hvac-damper-pressure-loss-d_1873.html
In a 12 inch duct @ 1050 CFM, that's a damper face velocity ##\approx 3000 ~ \rm{\frac{ft}{min}}##.
According to the chart that's close to 1.5"WC loss for the damper. That would give us a total of ##\approx 6 + 0.5+1.5 = 8## "WC.
If your motor rpm is correct ( it is run off a VFD ), then it indicates the fan is performing as expected.
It's possible someone decided to overspeed the motor a bit to make up for missing the design spec (or underestimating it).
If this turns out to be the case, (probably) the most economical route is to get a larger motor and change gearing to match the desired rpm as opposed to a system redesign. You'll have to check the ROR for each option.
$$ H(1300) \approx \frac{8}{1050^2}1300^2 = 12.3~\rm{WC}$$
I'd give that a 10% safety factor...so spec the motor hp/rpm about 13" WC @ 1300 CFM.
Last edited: