How to Determine Over-Amperage on Pulley Size Change?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Haotranphotomask
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Pulley
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the over-amperage issues related to a pulley size change for a fan system. Participants explore the implications of pulley sizes on motor performance, airflow, and static pressure, with a focus on achieving the desired airflow and pressure specifications.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their setup involving a VPB-808 Fan and a Baldor motor, noting that the current configuration is underperforming in terms of airflow.
  • Another participant suggests that the pulley sizes are too small and proposes a different pulley size configuration to achieve the necessary RPM ratio.
  • Some participants express concern that increasing pulley size may lead to over-amperage, while others question if decreasing the fan pulley size would have the same effect.
  • There are suggestions to check for slippage and to measure the actual RPM of the fan to ensure it meets the required specifications.
  • Participants discuss the importance of verifying the static pressure and airflow measurements, with some questioning the accuracy of the stated 7" WC at 950 CFM.
  • One participant mentions the possibility of energy wastage or incorrect parameters affecting performance, suggesting the use of a manual damper to reduce amperage.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need for larger pulleys for reliability in continuous use and mentions the potential need for multiple belts to reduce slippage.
  • There are calculations presented regarding the expected static pressure at different airflow rates, indicating that the system may require more horsepower than currently available.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the appropriate pulley sizes, the implications of over-amperage, and the accuracy of the static pressure measurements. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on the best course of action.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of verified measurements for RPM and static pressure, potential misinterpretations of the pulley sizes, and assumptions about the system's performance curve that have not been confirmed.

  • #61
It appears as though I underestimated the head loss from the damper.

https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/hvac-damper-pressure-loss-d_1873.html

In a 12 inch duct @ 1050 CFM, that's a damper face velocity ##\approx 3000 ~ \rm{\frac{ft}{min}}##.

According to the chart that's close to 1.5"WC loss for the damper. That would give us a total of ##\approx 6 + 0.5+1.5 = 8## "WC.

If your motor rpm is correct ( it is run off a VFD ), then it indicates the fan is performing as expected.

It's possible someone decided to overspeed the motor a bit to make up for missing the design spec (or underestimating it).

If this turns out to be the case, (probably) the most economical route is to get a larger motor and change gearing to match the desired rpm as opposed to a system redesign. You'll have to check the ROR for each option.

$$ H(1300) \approx \frac{8}{1050^2}1300^2 = 12.3~\rm{WC}$$

I'd give that a 10% safety factor...so spec the motor hp/rpm about 13" WC @ 1300 CFM.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #62
Haotranphotomask said:
I was able to measure the rotation of the fan.

Motor pulley size: 5.25”
Fan Pulley size: 3.75”
Center-to-Center: 13.5”
The RPM on motor pulley: 1920 RPM
The RPM on fan pulley: 2727 RPM
The static pressure is ~6”WC, but we are only getting 1050 CFM of flow through with one fan. I was able to get ~1200CFM if I have two fans on.

Would it be because the 8" trunk is too restrictive for 1300CFM of flow? What if I increase the fan size/resheave the belt? Would the 8" trunk still be limiting how much flow I could get through?
Yes, 8-inch round metal is not enough for that volume.
Maybe noise level should be considered if you follow the route of more input power.

Could you install additional ducts in parallel with that unfortunate 8-inch?

Time for some duct system calculations.
Please, see:
https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/sizing-ducts-d_207.html
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and erobz
  • #63
Lnewqban said:
Yes, 8-inch round metal is not enough for that volume.
Maybe noise level should be considered if you follow the route of more input power.

Could you install additional ducts in parallel with that unfortunate 8-inch?

Time for some duct system calculations.
Please, see:
https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/sizing-ducts-d_207.html
To me it looks like PVC (or worse CPVC) duct. There could be a sizable upfront cost with material/installation considerations if that is the case.

I think 2 motors up front cost, and annualized 2hp of additional electricity are going to win out

But as you say. Noise may dictate the system redesign expense.

In an industrial setting, I never calculated noise levels (not saying that one shouldn't - thinking back I did make a loud system once). For the most part If it was loud (it was just like everything else in the plant), you wear ear defenders\plugs! The tolerance of noise probably varies plant to plant and how much ambient noise already exist.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #64
I may have missed it (I looked). How are you measuring your actual CFM? I ask because:

1. Your blower dP is about where it should be
2. Your inlet absolute pressure is reasonable for the described plumbing at the described flow

Any chance that you're performing as expected and just have a bad flow measurement?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
20K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
12K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K