How to Determine Q for E(0,0,0)=0 with a Point Charge on a Semicircular Ring?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the charge Q required to achieve an electric field E(0,0,0) of zero, given a point charge at P(0,-4,0) and a uniformly distributed 10nC charge along a semicircular ring. The relevant equations include the line charge density formula Q=ρLdl and the electric field due to a point charge E=Q/(4πεR²). The solution involves integrating the electric field contributions from the semicircular ring and the point charge, ultimately leading to the equation E_t = E_ring - E_charge to solve for Q.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric field concepts and point charges
  • Familiarity with line charge density and integration techniques
  • Knowledge of coordinate systems, particularly polar coordinates
  • Basic grasp of electrostatics and the principles of symmetry in electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric fields from continuous charge distributions
  • Learn about the integration of electric fields in polar coordinates
  • Explore the concept of symmetry in electrostatics for simplifying problems
  • Review resources on line charge density and its applications in electric field calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as educators and anyone involved in solving problems related to electric fields and charge distributions.

Tater
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



6ab1703a-9eb8-437e-98ca-897848a9c148.jpg


A point charge Q is located at point P(0,-4,0) while a 10nc charge is uniformly distributed along a semicircular ring as shown in the figure. find the value of Q such that E(0,0,0)=0


Homework Equations



Q=ρLdl
dl = ρd∅ (because ρ and z are constant)
E=[itex]\frac{Qρ}{4piεr^2}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay so first I'd have to find Q using the formula above. I'd set my limits from 0 to pi.

Now looking at the formula for point charge, the only missing factor is R. I don't know how to express this. I know that the equation of a hemisphere is very similar to that of a circle. I came up with y=[itex]\sqrt{4-x^2}[/itex]. But now that I look at it, if I tried to convert that to polar using the relationships x=rcos[itex]\vartheta[/itex] and y=rsin[itex]\vartheta[/itex], it really seems wrong.

What's the best procedure in doing this? What should I say to myself every time I see a ring? Because to be honest, I really get confused when I see an odd figure labeled in terms of (x,y,z) even though it's much easier in another system.

Also, after finding R, I simply just stick to the formula and I will obtain my solution, right?

Thank you for any help :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First off you want to treat each case separately. By symmetry of the problem we know that the E-field will only be in the y-direction. Since the charge is distributed uniformly along the arc, you can deal with it as a line charge density which is what you did:
[itex]dQ_1=\rho_l(\rho d\phi)[/itex] now integrating that out you can get the line charge density in terms of [itex]Q_1[/itex] (which you'll want in the end).

So setting up the integral for the E-field:
Since your r is constant (r=2) you'll only be integrating over the angular change.
[itex]dE_y=\frac{\rho_l}{2\pi\epsilon_or}sin\phi d\phi[/itex]

Integrating that out should give you the E-field in the y-direction due to the hemisphere.

The point charge is just the E-field due to a point charge which is:
[itex]E = \frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_oR^2}[/itex] where Q is the charge you're solving for and R is the distance to the charge.

The total E-field:
[itex]E_t = E_{ring}-E_{charge}[/itex] and just solve for Q.

Hope this helps.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K