How to determine side load for 4x4 metal pole?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobca1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Load Metal Pole
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the suitability of a 4x4 steel pole for supporting a variable side load of up to 250 lbs at a height of 10 feet. Participants explore the structural integrity of the pole, including considerations of thickness and material properties, while discussing calculations related to cantilever beam models and safety factors.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires whether a 4x4 square pole with 1/4" thickness is sufficient for the application, expressing concerns about fatigue over time.
  • Another participant suggests modeling the scenario as a cantilever beam and provides a detailed calculation method, including necessary parameters like the area moment of inertia and yield strength of different steel grades.
  • A participant mentions a specific product from a metal supplier, comparing the stress and safety factor for both 1/4" and 3/8" thicknesses, while questioning the equivalence of A500 to A36 steel.
  • There is a discussion about the safety factor, with one participant recommending a higher safety factor due to the variability of the load.
  • Some participants challenge assumptions regarding material equivalency, emphasizing the importance of verifying material specifications rather than assuming equivalence based on identifiers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the adequacy of the pole's thickness and material properties, with no consensus reached regarding the equivalency of A500 and A36 steel. The discussion remains unresolved on several technical aspects, including the appropriate safety factor and the implications of different load sources.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the calculations and models presented are approximations and that the actual application may involve additional complexities, such as varying load conditions and potential impact forces.

bobca1
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I need to be able to support a variable side load up to a maximum of about 250lbs at 10' high. I am planning on using a 14' 4x4 steel pole that will be anchored 4ft in the ground (with concrete).
Question I have will 4x4 square pole be good for this application, and would 1/4" thickness would be sufficient? Thicker sidewalls like 3/8 and 1/2" also available but that significantly increases cost and weight. Not really concerned about deflection, but I would not want it to be so much as to cause fatigue over time.
Is this straight forward to calculate based on the information above, or anyone aware of rule-of-thumb table somewhere online I can consult for poles?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
You can model this as a cantilever beam with a single load at one end. There is a calculator here. In the calculator, you have to input the following:

E = 30 000 000 psi (for steel)
I = Area moment of inertia section properties (see other calculator below)
W = 250 lb (your load)
l = 120 in (distance between ground and load)
x = 0 in (distance from ground where the stress is the highest, which is at the ground)
neutral axis distance = Extreme point (see other calculator below)

For I and the neutral axis distance you can use this calculator. In the calculator, you have to input the following (select "Inch (in.)"):

a = 4 in (outside width)
b = outside width - 2 * thickness

The value of interest will be «Stress at specific point». This value is in psi. For a ¼" thick tube (b=3.5 in),the stress is 6818 psi. The yield strength of steel (i.e. the necessary stress to permanently deform the tube) is 53 700 psi for 1018 steel and 36 300 psi for A36 steel (1018 finish is smooth and shiny, A36 finish is rough).

Dividing the yield strength by the calculated stress will give you the safety factor. In this case, with 1018 you have a safety factor of 7.88 and with A36 you have 5.32.

Here, you have a source for common safety factors. Normally a safety factor of 4-6 should be good («Structural steelwork in buildings»). But the model and data I used are a crude approximation, your load will be varying (it is worst if it is an impact force), so I wouldn't feel comfortable recommending a minimum safety factor of 7. If life or costly equipment might be at risk, 10 would be even better.

This is as close as a rule of thumb you can have, but in the end, this is at your own risk.
 
bobca1 said:
I need to be able to support a variable side load up to a maximum of about 250lbs at 10' high. I am planning on using a 14' 4x4 steel pole that will be anchored 4ft in the ground (with concrete).
Question I have will 4x4 square pole be good for this application, and would 1/4" thickness would be sufficient? Thicker sidewalls like 3/8 and 1/2" also available but that significantly increases cost and weight. Not really concerned about deflection, but I would not want it to be so much as to cause fatigue over time.
Is this straight forward to calculate based on the information above, or anyone aware of rule-of-thumb table somewhere online I can consult for poles?

Welcome to the PF.

What is the application? What is the source of the side load? There is a big difference between supporting a sign, and supporting a person...
 
Thank you jack for the explanation and the calculators! At a local metal supplier I see a product listed as "hot rolled square tube ERW ASTM-A500 Grade B" and its available in both 1/4" thickness as well as 3/8". To compare products I plugged in 3/8" (b = 3.25"), I get a stress of 5,000 and a safety factor of 7.26. I assume that A500 is the tube equivalent of A36... that reasonable?
 
According to Wikipedia definitive source for everything :smile: says grade B A500 shaped is 315 MPa.
(I converted to 45,687 psi).
 
bobca1 said:
I assume that A500 is the tube equivalent of A36... that reasonable?
No, it's not reasonable. That's why the material is identified as A500 instead of A36. Standards have different identifiers for a reason.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K
Replies
8
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K