MHB How to Determine the Order of \( g^8 \) in a Group?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Element Group
Click For Summary
To determine the order of \( g^8 \) in a group where \( g \) has order \( 28 \), find the smallest \( k \) such that \( (g^8)^k = 1 \). This requires \( 8k \) to be a multiple of \( 28 \), leading to the formula \( k = \frac{\text{lcm}(28, 8)}{8} \). An alternative method involves using the greatest common divisor, expressed as \( k = \frac{28}{\gcd(28, i)} \) for any \( g^i \) where \( 2 \leq i \leq 27 \). This approach identifies common prime factors to simplify the calculation. Understanding these methods allows for systematic determination of orders for various powers of \( g \).
Guest2
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
Say an element $g$ in a group has order $28$. How do I find the order of say $g^8$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Guest said:
Say an element $g$ in a group has order $28$. How do I find the order of say $g^8$?

Hi Guest,

We are looking for the lowest $k$ such that $(g^{8})^k = 1$.
And we know that $28$ is the lowest such that $g^{28} = 1$.
That means we're looking for the lowest $k$ such that $8k$ is a multiple of $28$.
That is:
$$k = \frac{\text{lcm}(28,8)}{8}$$
 
I like Serena said:
Hi Guest,

We are looking for the lowest $k$ such that $(g^{8})^k = 1$.
And we know that $28$ is the lowest such that $g^{28} = 1$.
That means we're looking for the lowest $k$ such that $8k$ is a multiple of $28$.
That is:
$$k = \frac{\text{lcm}(28,8)}{8}$$
Thanks. I wonder whether there's a systematic way of working this out if one has to find $g^i$ for all $2 \le i \le 27$?
 
Last edited:
Guest said:
Thanks. I wonder whether there's a systematic way of working this out if one has to find $g^i$ for all $2 \le i \le 27$?

Alternatively, we can write it as:
$$k=\frac{28}{\gcd(28, i)}$$
That is, find the common prime factors and divide 28 by them.

I'm afraid that's as systematic as it gets.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
488
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
812
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
472
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K