How to diagonalize NxNxNxN matrix

  • Thread starter Thread starter ann3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
Diagonalizing an NxNxNxN symmetric matrix involves understanding its structure as a tensor rather than a traditional matrix. The discussion highlights the confusion around defining such a matrix and emphasizes that it consists of four indices (ijkl). It also notes that existing BLAS routines are not applicable for this higher-dimensional case. The conversation suggests that the problem may require tensor operations rather than standard matrix techniques. Understanding the tensor rank and how to manipulate these higher-dimensional objects is crucial for finding eigenvalues and eigenvectors.
ann3
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a symmetric NxNxNxN matrix that I need to find eigenvalues a eigenvectors for. All the BLAS routines are for NxN matrices and I can't find anything that would work on a 4D matrix. Any tricks you guys know of?
If it helps to know, it's a Hamiltonian and I want to find energies and wavenfunctions.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, how are you going to define an "NxNxNxN" matrix? A "4D matrix" is just a 4x 4 matrix. On what space is such a matrix acting?
 
I misspoke, it's not a 4D matrix, it's an N by N by N by N matrix. So there are ijkl indices.
 
In what sense would you multiply two NxNxNxN objects?
 
I think you're talking about Tensors now. Rank 0 tensor = Scalar, rank 1 tensor = vector, rank 2 tensor = matrix, rank 3+ is where you get into stuff you can't really visualize.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K