How to Expand and Simplify the Expression of Kronecker Delta?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jasonmcc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta Expanding
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the expansion and simplification of the expression $$\delta_{ij}\delta_{ij}$$ using the Einstein summation convention in three dimensions. The user, Jason, correctly simplifies the expression to 3, confirming that the expansion is valid within the context of linear algebra. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the meaning of "expand" in mathematical terms, emphasizing that it involves writing out all terms before simplification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kronecker Delta notation
  • Familiarity with Einstein summation convention
  • Basic knowledge of linear algebra concepts
  • Experience with tensor notation in continuum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Kronecker Delta in tensor calculus
  • Learn about the Einstein summation convention in detail
  • Explore linear algebra applications in continuum mechanics
  • Review examples of expanding and simplifying tensor expressions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering, particularly those studying linear algebra and continuum mechanics, will benefit from this discussion.

jasonmcc
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm working on a problem stated as:
Expand the following expression and simplify where possible
$$
\delta_{ij}\delta_{ij}
$$

I'm pretty sure this is correct, but not sure that I am satisfying the expand question. I'm not up to speed in linear algebra (taking a continuum mechanics course) - the question could be asking for $\hat{e}$ or matrix type expansion...

my solution:
\begin{alignat}{3}
\delta_{ij}\delta_{ij} & = & \delta_{ij}\delta_{ji}\\
& = & \delta_{ii}\\
& = & 3
\end{alignat}

Any suggestions for how to expand - or does this answer the question?
Thanks, Jason
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your working is correct if you're in 3 dimensions and you're using the Einstein summation convention.
 
Thanks. What do you think they mean by "Expand", then?
 
When you expand a sum like that, you're writing out every term, essentially. And then because they combine as you've shown, it collapses down to a nice compact number.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
11K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K