How to factor a Cubic Polynomial?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hilly117
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic Polynomial
Click For Summary
To factor the cubic polynomial f(x)=x^3-10x^2+17x+28, one should first identify a root by testing integer factors of the constant term, 28. The rational roots theorem indicates that any rational solution must be an integer that divides the constant term, with 1 and -1 being the simplest candidates. If a rational root is found, the polynomial can be reduced to a quadratic equation for further factoring. While there is no guarantee of a rational root, testing these integers is a practical approach. Ultimately, finding one root simplifies the factoring process significantly.
Hilly117
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Factorise:
f(x)=x^3-10x^2+17x+28
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First you have to guess one of the roots of the polynomial. Try substituting integer factors (divisors) of the constant term 28 in the polynomial and see which one is a root. Then you can reduce the problem to solving a quadratic equation.
 
There is a quite obvious factor to consider in such cases: +1 or -1.
 
SteamKing said:
There is a quite obvious factor to consider in such cases: +1 or -1.
:-p

Hilly172, both Hilbert2 and SteamKing are using the "rational roots theorem":
if rational number m/n satisfies the polynomial equation a_nx^n+ a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_1x+ a_0= 0, then the numerator, m, must evenly divide the "constant term", a_0, and the denominator, n, must evenly divide the "leading coefficient", a_n". Here, the leading coefficient is 1 and the only positive integer that divides that is 1 so any rational solution must have denominator 1- that is, must be an integer. And that integer must evenly divide, so must be a factor of, the constant term, 28. And the simplest such integers to start with are 1 and -1. The other factors of 28 are, of course, 2, -2, 4, -4, 7, -7, 14, and -14.

Of course, there is no guarentee that there is a rational root. But if there is not, the solution to the equation is going to be very difficult so it is worth trying. (And, as you have probably guessed from what Hilbert2 and SteamKing said, here, there is a very simple solution.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I didn't consciously set out use the RRT, I just scanned the polynomial to see if +1 or -1 would make it zero. For a cubic, you just need one root obtained by guessing or by plotting, and then Bob's your uncle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K