How to factorize the hydrogen atom Hamiltonian?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the factorization of the hydrogen atom Hamiltonian, represented as $$H=\frac{p^2}{2m} -\frac{e^2}{r}$$. Participants detail the process of deriving the factorized form $$H=\gamma +\frac{1}{2m}\sum_{k=1}^{3}\left(\hat p_k+i\beta\frac{\hat x_k}{r}\right)\left(\hat p_k-i\beta\frac{\hat x_k}{r}\right)$$ using the operator identity $$\hat{A}^2+\hat{B}^2=(\hat{A}-i\hat{B})(\hat{A}+i\hat{B})-i[\hat{A},\hat{B}]$$. The calculation of the commutators and the constants β and γ is emphasized as crucial for understanding the factorization process. The discussion concludes with a verification of the factorization and the importance of correctly applying the Hamiltonian's structure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics, specifically Hamiltonian operators.
  • Familiarity with commutation relations in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of operator identities and their applications in quantum physics.
  • Basic grasp of the hydrogen atom model and its mathematical representation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the hydrogen atom Hamiltonian in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about operator identities and their applications in quantum physics.
  • Explore the calculation of commutators in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate the role of constants in quantum mechanical equations, particularly in Hamiltonians.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, physicists working on atomic models, and anyone interested in advanced quantum operator techniques.

yamata1
Messages
61
Reaction score
1
Hello,
The hydrogen atom Hamiltonian is
$$H=\frac{p^2}{2m} -\frac{e^2}{r}\tag{1}$$
with e the elementary charge,m the mass of the electron,r the radius from the nucleus and p,the momentum. Apparently we can factorize H $$H=\gamma +\frac{1}{2m}\sum_{k=1}^{3}\left(\hat p_k+i\beta\frac{\hat x_k}{r}\right)\left(\hat p_k-i\beta\frac{\hat x_k}{r}\right)\tag{2}$$
for suitable constants β and γ that you can calculate. I assume the operator identity:
$$\hat{A}^2+\hat{B}^2=(\hat{A}-i\hat{B})(\hat{A}+i\hat{B})-i[\hat{A},\hat{B}]$$was used.
Can someone explain to me how we can start with formula (1) and make the position operator appear in (2)?
Here is the source https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics...all-2013/lecture-notes/MIT8_05F13_Chap_09.pdf pages 33-34
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The easiest way to verify the given factorization is to work backwards, starting with the right-hand side of the given identity and using the operator identity you gave:
$$ \begin{eqnarray*}
\sum_{k = 1}^3 \left( p_k + i \beta \frac{x_k}{r} \right) \left( p_k - i \beta \frac{x_k}{r} \right) &= \sum_{k = 1}^3 \left( p_k^2 + \beta^2 \frac{x_k^2}{r^2} + i \left[ p_k, \frac{\beta}{r} x_k \right] \right) \\
&= p^2 + \beta^2 + \sum_{k = 1}^3 \beta i \left[ p_k, \frac{x_k}{r} \right]
\end{eqnarray*}$$
The only things left to deal with are the commutators ## \left[ p_k, \frac{x_k}{r} \right] ##. I'm sure there's a clever way of calculating this basis-free, but it's easy enough to grind it out in the position basis:
$$ \begin{eqnarray*}
\left[ p_k, \frac{x_k}{r} \right] \psi &= -i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x_k} \left( \frac{x_k}{r} \psi \right) + i \hbar \left( \frac{x_k}{r} \right) \frac{\partial}{\partial x_k} \psi \\
&= -i \hbar \left( \frac{1}{r} - \frac{x_k^2}{r^3} \right) \psi
\end{eqnarray*}$$
so we have ## \left[ p_k, \frac{x_k}{r} \right] = -i\hbar / r + i \hbar x_k^2 / r^3 ##. In particular, since ##\Sigma_{k = 1}^3 x_k^2 = r^2##, the sum I started with is just
$$ p^2 + (\beta^2 + 3 \beta \hbar) - \frac{\beta \hbar}{r} $$
Plugging this into the expression for the Hamiltonian allows one to easily solve for ##\beta## and ##\gamma##.

As for how you'd actually come up with this factorization if you didn't already know it, all I can say is that after fiddling around with enough problems like this, the expression you gave seems like a plausible guess. Once you guess the correct factored form, it's a simple matter to work backwards as above to figure out what the constants must be.
 
Thank you for this answer. I made a mistake in calculating the commutator so I didn't have the term $$-\frac{\beta\hbar}{r}$$. If I understand correctly,I am left with:
$$-\frac{e^2}{r}=\gamma +\beta^2 +3\beta\hbar -\frac{\beta\hbar}{r}$$
and since β and γ are constants: Do we have$$-\frac{e^2}{r}=-\frac{\beta\hbar}{r} $$ ?
 
You're forgetting that the sum I calculated is multiplied by ##1 / (2m)## in the Hamiltonian. Otherwise, yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: yamata1
VKint said:
You're forgetting that the sum I calculated is multiplied by ##1 / (2m)## in the Hamiltonian. Otherwise, yes.
Thank you very much.
 
I think there is a mistake here
VKint said:
the sum I started with is just$$p^2 + (\beta^2 + 3 \beta \hbar) - \frac{\beta \hbar}{r}$$

$$\sum_{k = 1}^3 \beta i [ p_k, \frac{x_k}{r}]=\beta i(\frac {-3i\hbar}{r}+\frac {i\hbar r^2}{r^3})$$
So $$
\sum_{k = 1}^3 \left( p_k + i \beta \frac{x_k}{r} \right) \left( p_k - i \beta \frac{x_k}{r} \right)
=p^2+\beta^2+\frac {2\hbar \beta}{r}$$
but after seeing your question https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/commutator-of-p-and-x-r.933864/ the answer given makes it much simpler.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K