Commutator of p and x/r: Elegant Derivation in Position Basis

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter VKint
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutator
VKint
Messages
139
Reaction score
12
This question came up in this thread: <https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...ydrogen-atom-hamiltonian.933842/#post-5898454>

In the course of answering the OP's question, I came across the commutator
$$ \left[ p_k, \frac{x_k}{r} \right] $$
where ##r = (x_1 + x_2 + x_3)^{1/2}## and ##p_k## is the momentum operator conjugate to ##x_k##. It's easy to show that the commutator is
$$ -i \hbar \left( \frac{1}{r} - \frac{x_k^2}{r^3} \right) $$
by working in the position basis. My question is: Is there a more elegant way (i.e., independent of basis) of deriving this commutator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems to me that some squares are missing in the definition of r.

apart from that, a useful relation can be used

if ##[A,B]=C## and ##[A,C]=[B,C]=0## then
$$[A,f(B)]=f'(B).C$$

This can be proven from filling in the series expansion of f.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: yamata1
Yeah, it seems I typed out the question a bit too quickly :P

Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: thephystudent

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K