How to find a vector basis for this impossible form?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a basis for a subspace S of R^3 defined by vectors of the form (a, 2a-b, b)^T, where a and b are real numbers. Participants explore the implications of the dimensionality of subspaces within R^3.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the difficulty in finding three linearly independent vectors from the given form and question the dimensionality of the subspace. There are attempts to understand the relationship between the dimension of a subspace and the number of vectors in a basis.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing hints and clarifications regarding the nature of subspaces in R^3. There is an exploration of the concept that a subspace can have dimensions less than three, and the implications of this on the existence of a basis.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that while S is a subset of R^3, it does not necessarily imply that S has dimension 3. The conversation highlights the existence of subspaces with varying dimensions, including those that are lower than the dimension of the ambient space.

AngryHippo
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Find a basis for the subspace S of R^3 consisting of all vectors of the form
(a, 2a-b, b)^T, where a and b are real numbers

Relevant equations would really just be the determinant of the system.

I have tried so many 3x3 matrix combinations of the given form but no matter what the determinant always equals zero preventing me from saying it is a basis. I am guessing it is impossible to do but how would I prove that it is impossible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: what is the dimension of that subspace? Can this explain why you fail to find 3 linearly independent vectors of that form?
 
Well if the question says that S is in R^3 wouldn't S have to have the dimension 3?
 
AngryHippo said:
Well if the question says that S is in R^3 wouldn't S have to have the dimension 3?

No. There are many subspaces of R3. One of them consists only of the zero vector, so has dimension zero. There are an infinite number of lines through the origin, each of which is a subspace of R3, and each of which has dimension one.

There are an infinite number of planes that include the origin, each of which is a subspace of R3, and each of which has dimension two.

A subspace of a space with dimension n can be of any dimension from 0 up to and including n.
 
But it has to be a basis so it has to span and be linear independent. Doesn't have to be in dimension 3 to be able to span R^3?
 
A basis for a subspace has to span the subspace and must be linearly independent, yes. Each vector in the basis has three coordinates, as do all vectors in R3, but the dimension of a basis is how many vectors are in the basis, not how many coordinates there are in each vector.
 
For example, the set S = {(x, y, z) | x = y, z = 0} is a line in R3 and happens to be a subspace of R3. There are an infinite number of points on this line, a couple of which are (2, 2, 0) and (-1, -1, 0). You can also think of these as vectors, <2, 2, 0> and <-1, -1, 0>.

A basis for this subspace is {<1, 1, 0>}. Since there is only one vector in the basis, the dimension of the subspace is one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K