How to Find an Explicit Description of a Plane from an Implicit Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hogrampage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explicit Plane
Click For Summary
To find an explicit description of a plane from an implicit equation like 3x + 2y - z = 0, the plane can be described as the span of two vectors if it passes through the origin. By solving for one variable in terms of the others, such as z = 3x + 2y, you can express the plane parametrically. This leads to a representation where x and y are parameters, resulting in vectors like [1, 0, 3] and [0, 1, 2] that span the plane. The discussion clarifies that the explicit description requires the plane to pass through the origin for a straightforward vector span. Understanding these concepts allows for a clear representation of the plane's geometry.
hogrampage
Messages
107
Reaction score
1
I understand how to find an implicit description if given the span of, say, two vectors. How do I go about finding an explicit description of a plane as the span of two vectors? For example, where would I start if the plane equation was:

3x+2y-z = 0

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean with "explicit description"? What is it of the plane that you would like to know?
 
i.e. Describe the plane as the span of a two-vector set.
 
hogrampage said:
i.e. Describe the plane as the span of a two-vector set.
You can only do that if the plane passes through the origin. Otherwise, it is such a span plus some constant vector.

But in your example, the plane passes through the origin, and the simplest way to find two vectors spanning the plane is to solve for one variable and put the others as parameters, say:
z=3x+2y, which leads to

##x=s##, ##y=t##, ##z=3s+2t##, or

##[x\,\, y\,\, z]^T=[s\,\, t\,\, 3s+2t]^T=s[1\, \,0\,\, 3]^T+t[0\,\,1\,\,2]^T##.
 
Okay, that is what I was thinking, but wasn't positive.

Thank you
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K