Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around finding the angle between two vectors given their spherical coordinates. Participants explore the mathematical formulation and proofs related to this topic, including the conversion of spherical coordinates to Cartesian coordinates and the use of inner products.
Discussion Character
- Mathematical reasoning
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant presents the formula $\arccos{(\cos{\phi_1}\cos{\phi_2}+\sin{\phi_1}\sin{\phi_2}\cos{(\theta_2-\theta_1)})}=\gamma$ and requests a proof for it.
- Another participant provides the Cartesian coordinates for points $P_1$ and $P_2$ derived from their spherical coordinates and suggests using the inner product to find the angle.
- There is a discussion about the representation of the Cartesian coordinates, with one participant noting a difference in the use of $\theta$ and $\phi$ in their respective formulations.
- One participant suggests that switching the $\theta$s and $\phi$s in the hint provided could lead to proving the result.
- A clarification is made regarding the inner product notation, confirming that it represents the dot product of vectors.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the representation of spherical coordinates in Cartesian form, indicating a lack of consensus on the correct approach. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the proof of the angle formula.
Contextual Notes
There are unresolved aspects regarding the assumptions made in the conversion between spherical and Cartesian coordinates, as well as the specific definitions of the angles involved.