Dot product for vectors in spherical coordinates

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of calculating the dot product between vectors expressed in spherical coordinates, specifically when the vectors are centered at different points in spherical space. Participants explore the implications of differing basis vectors and the complexities involved without converting to Cartesian coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses difficulty in taking the dot product of two spherical-coordinate vectors due to differing bases and the complexity involved.
  • Another participant questions the meaning of "different basis" and seeks clarification on the issue.
  • A participant suggests that there may not be a meaningful definition of the dot product in spherical coordinates without conversion to Cartesian coordinates.
  • Clarification is provided that the basis vectors in spherical coordinates depend on the angles, which complicates the calculation of the dot product.
  • Concerns are raised about the local orthonormal basis in spherical coordinates not aligning with a global coordinate basis, making it challenging to derive a straightforward expression for the dot product.
  • One participant mentions their motivation for the inquiry stems from an assignment related to the angular momentum operator in spherical coordinates.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the feasibility of calculating the dot product directly in spherical coordinates, with some expressing skepticism about the existence of a meaningful definition without conversion to Cartesian coordinates. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to take.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the limitations of using spherical coordinates for dot products due to the dependence of basis vectors on angles and the lack of a neat expression for the dot product in this coordinate system.

Wminus
Messages
173
Reaction score
29
Hi all.

I'm struggling with taking dot products between vectors in spherical coordinates. I just cannot figure out how to take the dot product between two arbitrary spherical-coordinate vectors ##\bf{v_1}## centered in ##(r_1,\theta_1,\phi_1)## and ##\bf{v_2}## centered in ##(r_2,\theta_2,\phi_2)## without converting them to cartesian coordinates first.

Could you guys please help me? The main issue is that the basis for ##v_1## and ##v_2## are different so everything becomes super complicated.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
By the way, if this requires advanced mathematics and is very complicated, please just tell me that's the case instead of spending your time writing a long post. I don't really have the time to dwell too long on this issue.
 
Your last remark is confusing. What do you mean by "basis for v1 and v2 are different"?
 
Wminus said:
Hi all.

I'm struggling with taking dot products between vectors in spherical coordinates. I just cannot figure out how to take the dot product between two arbitrary spherical-coordinate vectors ##\bf{v_1}## centered in ##(r_1,\theta_1,\phi_1)## and ##\bf{v_2}## centered in ##(r_2,\theta_2,\phi_2)## without converting them to cartesian coordinates first.

Could you guys please help me? The main issue is that the basis for ##v_1## and ##v_2## are different so everything becomes super complicated.

Thanks
I don't think there is a definition of the dot (scalar) product which involves using vectors expressed in spherical coordinates, at least, not one which makes sense.

What started you down this dark road in the first place?
 
mathman said:
Your last remark is confusing. What do you mean by "basis for v1 and v2 are different"?

The basis vectors ##\hat{\phi}##, ##\hat{\theta}## depend on the angles ##\phi##,##\theta##. This is what I meant with the basis are different for vectors centered in different points of spherical space. Sorry for the confusion.

SteamKing said:
I don't think there is a definition of the dot (scalar) product which involves using vectors expressed in spherical coordinates, at least, not one which makes sense.

What started you down this dark road in the first place?

I was derailed while doing an assignment :( . I ended up wanting to calculate ##\vec{L} \cdot \vec{L}## where ##\vec{L} = -i \hbar \vec{r} \times \nabla## is the angular momentum operator in spherical coordinates.
 
Wminus said:
The basis vectors ϕ^\hat{\phi}, θ^\hat{\theta} depend on the angles ϕ\phi,θ\theta. This is what I meant with the basis are different for vectors centered in different points of spherical space. Sorry for the confusion.
The main problem is that in spherical coordinates, the local orthonormal basis are not the global coordinate basis, and hence you cannot obtain a 'neat' expression for the dot product using them. You can obtain an expression in terms of them using Cartesian conversions, but the expression is long, and it would be better to simply change coordinates first and then perform the dot product.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K