How to find group types for a particular order?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jackmell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
Click For Summary
Determining group types for a specific order involves understanding the structure of finite groups, particularly through the use of Cayley tables and classification theorems. For groups of prime order, they are always cyclic, while finite abelian groups can be expressed as a product of cyclic groups. Non-abelian groups require deeper analysis, such as identifying that the only non-abelian group of order 6 is the dihedral group D6. For larger orders, like 12, there are multiple non-abelian groups, including dihedral and dicyclic groups, and the classification can involve checking isomorphisms between group structures. Resources like Sylow's theorems and specific mathematical notes can aid in this classification process.
jackmell
Messages
1,806
Reaction score
54
Hi,

How do we determine the group types for a particular order? I know the example of using the Cayley table to show there are only two types of groups of order 4 but do not know how to determine this for other groups. For example, suppose I wanted to show there is a group of order 10 in the alternating group ##A_5##. Now, according to Wikipedia, this group must be cyclic or dihedral. Wikipedia lists a table of small groups:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_small_groups

How do we determine this?

Here's what I have so far:

(1) If the group order is prime then it must be a cyclic group. Therefore, there are no non-abelian groups with prime order.

(2) Let G be a finite Abelian group. Then G is isomorphic to a product of groups of the form ##H_p = Z/p^{e1}Z×···×Z/p^{en}Z##, in which ##p## is a prime number and ##1\leq e1 \leq···\leq en## are positive integers

not real clear on #2 but let's assume I got that. So that leaves non-abelian groups. Take for example a group of size 6. How do I conclude that the only non-abelian group of order 6 is ##D_6## and all other non-abelian groups with that size are isomorphic to ##D_6##?

Then take for example a non-abelian group of size ##8##. Well ##D_8## and ##Q## (quaternions) are of that size. So then any other are isomorphic to those two. How would I prove this? That no matter what kind of non-abelian group of size 8 I could invent, it must be isomorphic to these two.

(3) Let G by a group of order 2p with p a prime number, then G is either cyclic or isomorphic to ##D_p##. (need to review this proof I think). Ok, then that answers my question for the case of ##|G|=10##.

Guess I should know these already.

What about when it's not 2p though, say for 12? Well, one of them is dihedral, ##D_{12}##. Is that the only non-abelian group of size 12?. I think there is a dicyclic also however. Certainly exists a cyclic group ##C_{12}## also. But there is also a product one ##Z_6\times Z_2##. But then why isn't there a ##Z_3\times Z_4## then? Maybe they're isomorphic. Need to check.

There is a ##Z_3\times Z_4##. Also not hard to show ##Z_{10}\cong Z_5\times Z_2##. Same dif for ##Z_{12}\cong Z_3\times Z_4##. However, ##Z_6\times Z_2 \ncong Z_3\times Z_4## (try coming up with an isomorphism) and so therefore ##Z_{12}\ncong Z_6\times Z_2##.

I think I'm getting it guys.

Thanks,
Jack
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You might consult pages 37-50 of these notes, in the section on "using sylow to classify small groups".

http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~roy/843-1.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes jackmell
mathwonk said:
You might consult pages 37-50 of these notes, in the section on "using sylow to classify small groups".

http://alpha.math.uga.edu/~roy/843-1.pdf

Thanks mathwonk. That's very informative and I'm sure I'll use it while I'm studying abstract algebra. For example, just briefly running though it I noticed it had a very good summary of the various generators for the symmetric group including the one I had worked on recently here and elsewhere about when ##n## is a prime ##p## than any transposition and any ##p##-cycle generates the group. I'm also finding GAP very useful in that regards (thanks to micromass).

Jack
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
853
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K