MHB How to find set from following condition.

  • Thread starter Thread starter rajemessage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition Set
rajemessage
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
how can i find the sets from following situation.
i have three numbers,{1 2 3} which will always be in this order {123},
i want to find out number of cases can be made.

but 2 can come at frist position that is before 1 or at second position or at
third position that is after 3.
and all are optional.

please solve this question with forumulas so that i can find set of bignumbers too.

yours sincerly
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you have $n$ objects, then there are $n!$ ways to order them. You have $n$ choices for the first position, $n-1$ for the second and so on.
 
rajemessage said:
how can i find the sets from following situation.
i have three numbers,{1 2 3} which will always be in this order {123},
i want to find out number of cases can be made.

but 2 can come at frist position that is before 1 or at second position or at
third position that is after 3.
and all are optional.

please solve this question with forumulas so that i can find set of bignumbers too.

yours sincerly

Your problem statement is self-contradictory. The numbers cannot always be in the order $\{1,2,3\}$ if you're allowing $2$ to be at the first position. Or are you allowing the order to "wrap around"? In that case, you could have $\{1,2,3\}, \{2,3,1\}, \{3,1,2\}$, so there are $n$ possibilities.

Or are you asking how many permutations of the set there are? If so, MarkFL's answer is correct.

Or are you asking how many subsets of $\{1,2,3\}$ there are (or what is the power set)? If so, then think about for any given subset, whether you're going to include an element or not, and that'll get you going in the right direction.

It would be very helpful if you could please give us the original problem statement, word-for-word.
 
Ackbach said:
Your problem statement is self-contradictory. The numbers cannot always be in the order $\{1,2,3\}$ if you're allowing $2$ to be at the first position. Or are you allowing the order to "wrap around"? In that case, you could have $\{1,2,3\}, \{2,3,1\}, \{3,1,2\}$, so there are $n$ possibilities.

Or are you asking how many permutations of the set there are? If so, MarkFL's answer is correct.

Or are you asking how many subsets of $\{1,2,3\}$ there are (or what is the power set)? If so, then think about for any given subset, whether you're going to include an element or not, and that'll get you going in the right direction.

It would be very helpful if you could please give us the original problem statement, word-for-word.

yes 123 can not be in this order if i change the position of 2, basically it is my condition.

i am re writing the same problem with conditions.

i want to find out set/case in following situation.

there are three number.{1,2,3}

"1" can have three states,(it will not exist,it will exist and it will be always less than "3")

"2" can have four states, it can be less than "1" , greater than "1" and less than "3", greater than "3" ,existing ,not existing.

"3" can have three states,(not exist,exist and it will be always greater than "1")

"all numbers 1,2,3 are optional".

Q1) how many sets will be there
Q2) what will be that sets/combination
Q3) how to find condition based sets for big number like above

yours sincerely
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top