How to find the equilibrium position and potential energy?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a mass attached to a spring, where participants are tasked with finding the equilibrium position and potential energy of the system. The setup includes a massless spring with a spring constant k, an unstretched length L_0, and a mass m positioned at a height x above a platform of height h.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the spring's displacement and the equilibrium position, questioning whether the height x+h represents the equilibrium state. There is discussion about the validity of using Hooke's law and the conditions for equilibrium, particularly the necessity for net forces to equal zero.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the conditions for equilibrium and the expressions for kinetic and potential energy. There is an ongoing exploration of how to express these energies in terms of the variable x, with no clear consensus reached on the correct approach or interpretation of the problem setup.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem does not explicitly state the equilibrium position and that assumptions about the forces acting on the mass may need to be clarified. There is also mention of the requirement to express all results in terms of x, which adds complexity to the discussion.

KFC
Messages
477
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Given a setup with spring, the massless spring constant is k, unstretched length of the spring is [tex]L_0[/tex]. A mass m is attaching to the top of the spring. We only know the height of the mass (measuring from the top of the platform) is x, the height of the platform is h. Try to find the equilibrium position of the system, the potential energy and kinetic energy of the system in terms of x.

http://img150.imageshack.us/img150/5247/a101pc3.jpg

2. The attempt at a solution
I setup a coordinate system with the origin on CD line, call the vertical axis X (capital X). The hooke law gives

[tex]mg = -k\Delta X, \qquad \Delta X = x + h - L_0[/tex]

For finding the equilibrium position ([tex]x_0[/tex]), we let [tex]\Delta X = x + h - L_0 = 0[/tex] gives [tex]x_0 = L_0 - h[/tex]

The kinetic energy of the mass is obvious

[tex]E_k = \frac{m}{2}\left(\frac{dX}{dt}\right)^2 = \frac{m}{2}\left[\frac{d(x+h)}{dt}\right]^2 = \frac{m}{2}\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2[/tex]

For the potential energy, we have
[tex]E_p = \frac{k}{2}(\Delta X)^2 = \frac{k}{2}\left(x + h - L_0)^2[/tex]

But the answer for the potential energy is
[tex]E_p = \frac{k}{2}x^2[/tex]

How is that possible?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
There are a couple of things which I am not too sure about. Is it given that x+h is the equilibrium position of the system (ie the system is in equilibrium in the diagram?). If it isnt, then your equation [tex]\Delta x=x+h-L_0[/tex] is not valid.

Even if the system is in equilibrium, why would [tex]\Delta x=x+h-L_0=0[/tex] give you the equilibrium position? That would give you the initial position of the spring when its uncompressed.
 
Thanks for reply. The problem doesn't tell x+h is the equilibrium position. Well, for vertical spring, I think the equilibrium position is where the force (or acceleration) is ZERO. So I let mg=0 that gives [tex]\Delta X=0[/tex]. Am I doing anything wrong? If so, please help me. Thanks

chaoseverlasting said:
There are a couple of things which I am not too sure about. Is it given that x+h is the equilibrium position of the system (ie the system is in equilibrium in the diagram?). If it isnt, then your equation [tex]\Delta x=x+h-L_0[/tex] is not valid.

Even if the system is in equilibrium, why would [tex]\Delta x=x+h-L_0=0[/tex] give you the equilibrium position? That would give you the initial position of the spring when its uncompressed.
 
If you assume cd to be the origin line, then let the distance of the block from the line be y. As such, the potential energy of the block is given by mgy.

Also, the kinetic energy of the block is [tex]\frac{1}{2}mv^2[/tex] where [tex]v=\frac{dy}{dt}[/tex].

Now you have to express v2 in terms of y to get the expression for kinetic energy.

To do this you need express find the force equation of the block in terms of y. This gives you [tex]F=mg-k(x+h-y)[/tex]. From this you can get the value of [tex]\frac{v^2}{2}[/tex] and hence the expression for kinetic energy.

Now you know the expressions for KE and PE. Add them up and you get total energy. At equilibrium, the total energy must be minimum. You can find the minima of the system as the expression for the total energy will be a function of y, which will give you the equilibrium position.

I know its a little long, maybe someone else can come up with a shorter way to do it.
 
KFC said:
Thanks for reply. The problem doesn't tell x+h is the equilibrium position. Well, for vertical spring, I think the equilibrium position is where the force (or acceleration) is ZERO. So I let mg=0 that gives [tex]\Delta X=0[/tex]. Am I doing anything wrong? If so, please help me. Thanks

Youre right, the force must be zero, but that is the NET force acting on the block. In this case, the net force is the gravitational force MINUS the force of the spring. That value must be zero, not mg.
 
Ok, I just update the figure and add the coordinate system. With your hints, I reconsider the solution and note that the problem require to express all answers in terms of [tex]x[/tex].

1) First calculate the kinetic energy, I know that (as you told) the the kinetic energy will be

[tex]E_k = \frac{m}{2}\left(\frac{dy}{dt}\right)^2[/tex]

Since [tex]y=x+h[/tex], so we also have

[tex]E_k = \frac{m}{2}\left(\frac{dx}{dt}\right)^2[/tex]

2) For finding the equilibrium position, we must set the total force to zero, let the unstretched length of spring be [tex]L_0[/tex]

[tex]F = mg - k(x+h - L_0) = 0[/tex]

gives the equilibrium position (measure from the top of the platform) be

[tex]x_0 = \frac{mg}{k}(L_0 - h)[/tex]

3) The elastic potential energy in terms of [tex]x[/tex] is
[tex]E_{ep} = \frac{k}{2}(x - x_0)^2[/tex]


Hope these results are correct :)


chaoseverlasting said:
If you assume cd to be the origin line, then let the distance of the block from the line be y. As such, the potential energy of the block is given by mgy.

Also, the kinetic energy of the block is [tex]\frac{1}{2}mv^2[/tex] where [tex]v=\frac{dy}{dt}[/tex].

Now you have to express v2 in terms of y to get the expression for kinetic energy.

To do this you need express find the force equation of the block in terms of y. This gives you [tex]F=mg-k(x+h-y)[/tex]. From this you can get the value of [tex]\frac{v^2}{2}[/tex] and hence the expression for kinetic energy.

Now you know the expressions for KE and PE. Add them up and you get total energy. At equilibrium, the total energy must be minimum. You can find the minima of the system as the expression for the total energy will be a function of y, which will give you the equilibrium position.

I know its a little long, maybe someone else can come up with a shorter way to do it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K