How to get a # out of moment of the parallel axis theorm

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the moment of inertia using the parallel axis theorem for a system of four masses connected by massless rods. Participants are addressing the specifics of the problem presented in a textbook figure and the interpretation of the axes involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the parallel axis theorem and the calculation of the center of mass. There are questions about the correct interpretation of the axis of rotation and how to determine distances for the moment of inertia calculation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the definitions of mass and distance in the context of the moment of inertia formula. There is ongoing exploration of how to accurately apply these concepts to the problem at hand, with no clear consensus yet on the final approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note confusion regarding the phrasing of the problem and the specific points on the diagonal rod that should be considered for calculations. There is also mention of the need to calculate distances to the axis accurately, which may involve identifying the closest points on the diagonal.

pinkfishegg
Messages
57
Reaction score
3
The question is : four masses shown in figure 12.14 (Knight 12.14) are connected by massless, rigid rods. (see attached fig)
A) find the coordinates of the center of mass
B) find the moment of inertia about a diagonal mass that passed through B and D
so I got part a right by setting the x-y axis at A and using
X-bar=(200g(10cm)+200(10))/700g=(40/7)cm=5.7cm
Y-Bar=5.7cm


I'm unsure how to do part B
I can use the parallel axis theorum

I=[/cm]+M[d[/2]
but I'm unsure how to use the MD^2 part. M i just the sum of all the masses right? D would (√x^2+y^2)^2 which is just x^2 plus y^2. But they're askng for a number for moment of inertia and i don't know which point they are looking at on the diagonal rod. What am i missing here?
 

Attachments

  • fig 12.14.png
    fig 12.14.png
    3.9 KB · Views: 424
Physics news on Phys.org
pinkfishegg said:
I can use the parallel axis theorum
You could, but this is much easier if you just apply the usual formula for the moment of inertia. You know the axis and you can calculate the distances to this axis.
pinkfishegg said:
and i don't know which point they are looking at on the diagonal rod.
I think the diagonal rod is the axis? The phrasing of the problem statement is a bit odd.
 
mfb said:
You could, but this is much easier if you just apply the usual formula for the moment of inertia. You know the axis and you can calculate the distances to this axis.
I think the diagonal rod is the axis? The phrasing of the problem statement is a bit odd.
Yeah the diagonal rod is the axis and the center of mass is at (5.7 cm , 5.7 cm)
What confused me is which part of the axis i start using the moment of inertia formula from.
It's Icm=∑Mr^2. So M is just the sum of the masses. Is r the distance from the axis to the center of mass then?this changes depending on your position. so i guess you make an integral but then what can you plug into the integral?
 
M are the individual masses, not their sum (because the sum sign is running over all masses).
pinkfishegg said:
Is r the distance from the axis to the center of mass then?
It is the distance from the axis to the individual masses. It will be different for each mass.
There is nothing to integrate. You are overthinking this, the solution can be written down in a single line.
 
mfb said:
M are the individual masses, not their sum (because the sum sign is running over all masses).It is the distance from the axis to the individual masses. It will be different for each mass.
There is nothing to integrate. You are overthinking this, the solution can be written down in a single line.

Wait can i just pick any point on the axis and plug in

I=sum(MD^2)
 
No you cannot pick a point. You have to calculate the distance to the axis. This is defined as the distance to the closest point (which you can find).
 
mfb said:
No you cannot pick a point. You have to calculate the distance to the axis. This is defined as the distance to the closest point (which you can find).

Oh i see so the closest distance to points B and D is just 0 because the line is on both B and D. The closest point to points A and C would be in the center of the diagonal (x=5 cm y=5cm+ and the distance to the other points would be (sqrt (5-0)cm+(5-0)cm)^2 and (sqrt (10-5)cm+(10-5)cm)^2 = sqrt(50)cm=2sqrt(5cm) in both cases?
 
I think the square root got misplaced. Apart from that, right.
 
mfb said:
I think the square root got misplaced. Apart from that, right.
oh i see yeah i completely over-complicated this thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K