How to get roots of this complex equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the complex roots of the equation λ^4 = 0, as presented in a scientific article. Participants are exploring the implications of this equation in the context of linear partial differential equations and the necessity of obtaining four distinct complex roots.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how the equation λ^4 = 0 can yield four complex roots, suggesting it seems to imply only a single root at zero.
  • Another participant lists the roots as 0∠0°, 0∠90°, 0∠180°, and 0∠270°.
  • A participant introduces additional context by referencing three linear partial differential equations and the need to find four complex λ values, questioning the applicability of the previous answers.
  • Some participants assert that the only root is λ = 0, linking it to the characteristic equation of a differential equation with constant coefficients and suggesting that independent solutions are related to this root.
  • One participant mentions the concept of repeated roots and suggests looking for information in the article regarding their implications.
  • Another participant elaborates on the solution strategy for homogeneous differential equations, discussing the need for distinct solutions when roots are repeated and referencing the method of variation of parameters.
  • A participant insists that the article indicates the necessity of four distinct λ values and seeks clarification on how to derive these from λ^4 = 0.
  • One participant asks for further ideas or suggestions from others in the thread.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the nature of the roots. While some assert that the only root is zero, others emphasize the need for four distinct complex roots, leading to an unresolved discussion regarding the interpretation of the equation and its implications in the context provided.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of interpreting the roots of the equation λ^4 = 0, particularly in relation to the context of differential equations and the potential for repeated roots. There are references to specific equations and solutions that are not fully detailed in the thread.

pm1366
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


hello, i am stucked at an article from sciencedirect . somewhere it gives me the following equation and then it tells that this equation must have 4 complex roots!

the variable is lambda and we want to find 4 lambda complex roots

Homework Equations


λ^4=0

The Attempt at a Solution



i am amazed how we can get 4 complex roots from this equation as it seems to have roots equal to zero !

Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The four roots are:

0∠0°
0∠90°
0∠180°
0∠270°
 
The Electrician said:
The four roots are:

0∠0°
0∠90°
0∠180°
0∠270°

thanks for reply but i forgot to explain more, here it is:

we have 3 linear partial differential equations:

http://i45.fastpic.ru/big/2012/1027/8f/429c9d2a3bd454656212ed589156f38f.jpg

now for homogeneous solution we're going to substitute below Equation into Eqs. (11) and (12) at the above picture:

http://i44.fastpic.ru/big/2012/1027/e0/ef375cf97523a4d907b0d504bd9664e0.jpg

the rest is explained below:

0fadb8d694904b04a23e414d2fae1612.jpg


now what I've done is substituting Equation 17 into Eqs. (11) and (12), the result is these 2 equations ("s" same as "x" ):

http://i45.fastpic.ru/big/2012/1027/86/b87473ecf6018ce0ab166cfb71a4c086.jpg

don't mind what the coefficients A,D & B are... they're constants.
also L differential operators are given in Appendix and I've used them

now the determinant of the coefficient matrix must vanish (=0) , the result would be this way:

http://i44.fastpic.ru/big/2012/1027/1a/e6d25171f9daaf47e13b1197ff7bf81a.jpg

and in this equation we must find 4 complex roots , i mean 4 complex lambda's
( maybe we can think this equation is correct for all values of x , so we may only have λ^4=0 )i think your answers are not applicable here

Big thanks to anyOne help me in this matter...
 
Last edited:
Yes, obviously the only root is \lambda= 0. Since you now tell us that this is the characteristic equation of a differential equation with constant coefficients, that means that four independent solutions to the equation are e0x= 1, x, x2, and x3.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, obviously the only root is \lambda= 0. Since you now tell us that this is the characteristic equation of a differential equation with constant coefficients, that means that four independent solutions to the equation are e0x= 1, x, x2, and x3.

thanks...this is some likely answer , but here in this article we need 4 different lambda's .
besides, as u see the four independent solutions are different from those u mentioned...that is exponential in the series form and 4 lambda's are included:

http://i45.fastpic.ru/big/2012/1027/2f/678839cd8c87271c8453274f1a30b72f.jpg
 
That statement is assuming the roots are different. See if you can find something in the article talking about repeated roots and what happens for those.
 
aralbrec said:
That statement is assuming the roots are different. See if you can find something in the article talking about repeated roots and what happens for those.

no :frown: ,no where talking about that ... it is an article about cylindrical shells , i can give it to anyone who want to have a look...
 
pm1366 said:
no :frown: ,no where talking about that ... it is an article about cylindrical shells , i can give it to anyone who want to have a look...

Look up 'repeated roots' and 'differential equations' in your textbooks or on the internet.

The solution strategy is this:

You have a homogeneous differential equation (ie one that solves Dy = 0, where D is some differential operator).

Taking a function and adding derivatives of itself to get zero is only possible with the exponential function, so it is assumed that the solution will be of the form y=eλt . Plug that into the differential equation and you have conditions on λ for that solution to work. The condition on λ is called the characteristic equation . Since y=eλt for a specific λ satisfying the characteristic equation has been found to solve the homogeneous equation, a sum of all eλt with every λ found must also solve the homogeneous equation because differentiation is linear. So the total homogeneous solution is Ʃ Aieλit as your excerpt states.

From other considerations we know an nth order differential equation has n independent functions that satisfy the homogeneous equation. If some of the λ are repeated (eg you have four zeroes for λ), you are not finding all those functions so you have to have another way to find them. That part the article hasn't mentioned but HallsOfIvy gave you the solutions -- the idea is to assume the solution is the form of eλt, teλt, t2eλt, ... the highest power of t depending on how many repeated roots you have (if you have four repeated roots, you need four equations with that root). You can confirm these also satisfy the differential equation by substitution and the resulting complete solution will be a summation of all such functions you found.

The idea of doing this is called 'variation of parameters'. The notion was Aeλt is one solution, what if A was allowed to be a function of time, would that work? Plug into the differential equation, and lo and behold, it does with A=tn for some n.
 
Last edited:
@aralbrec
thank you for your help, i get what you're saying , but please look at this red line I've drawn in this picture:
http://i45.fastpic.ru/big/2012/1027/2f/678839cd8c87271c8453274f1a30b72f.jpg

it is showing that there must be 4 different lambda for the solution and not repeated lambda's ( λ i=1,2,3,4 )
in this picture there's no solution for repeated roots...
i mean we must have 4 different roots , but the problem is how to find four different complex roots!

suppose that we know lambda is complex from the beginning ,now how to find 4 complex roots from λ^4=0 or similarly Z^4=0 assuming Z::complex ? is there any kind of solution except zero?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
any other ideas friends ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K