How to Handle the Distribution 1/(x-i0)^2?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 3K views
ziojoe
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a little problem with the following exercise:
"Consider the temperate distribution

[tex]f\left(x\right)=\frac{1}{\left(x-i0\right)^2}[/tex]

Write f(x) like function of elementary temperate distributions and calculate its Fourier-transform."
I am almost sure I have to use the identity

[tex]\frac{1}{x-i0}=PP\frac{1}{x}+i\pi\delta\left(x\right)[/tex]

But the square makes appear terms like [tex]\delta^2\left(x\right)[/tex], that is not a distribution.

Any idea?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is "the temperate distribution", and what is an "elementary temperate distribution"?

What is "i0"? E.g. is 0 simply an arbitrarily small positive number?

The original equation defines a function with one double pole (assuming my example interpretation of 0 above). I don't see any need to use distribution theory. You can evaluate the Fourier transform using the Cauchy Integral Theorem (assuming my example interpretation of 0 above).
 
turin said:
What is "the temperate distribution", and what is an "elementary temperate distribution"?

I think this means "tempered distribution" and "regular distribution that is also a tempered distribution."
turin said:
What is "i0"? E.g. is 0 simply an arbitrarily small positive number?

I think so. This is usually denoted [itex]x- i \epsilon[/itex].
turin said:
The original equation defines a function with one double pole (assuming my example interpretation of 0 above). I don't see any need to use distribution theory. You can evaluate the Fourier transform using the Cauchy Integral Theorem (assuming my example interpretation of 0 above).

But I think the idea behind the question is to gain familiarity with distribution theory.
ziojoe said:
Any idea?

[tex]\frac{1}{\left( x - i \epsilon \right)^2} = - \frac{d}{dx} \left[ \frac{1}{ x - i \epsilon} \right][/tex]
 
Thanks, that was exactly the answer I got myself after a while. Thanks again.