How to Handle Zero Eigenvalues in the Generalized Eigenvalue Problem?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on solving a generalized eigenvalue problem where the matrices A and B yield two zero eigenvalues, indicating redundancy in the system. The user seeks to reduce the system to eliminate these zero eigenvalues before calculating the eigenvalues. It is noted that having zero eigenvalues can be expected based on the ranks of matrices A and B, suggesting that the system can move freely in certain directions. The user acknowledges the physical interpretation of these zero eigenvalues but aims to find a method to simplify the problem beforehand. The conversation highlights the balance between mathematical reduction and physical relevance in eigenvalue problems.
member 399911
Hi all,

I need to find the λ and the ai that solves the Generalized eigenvalue problem

[A]{a}=-λ2 {a}

with

[A]=
Code:
-1289.57,1204.12,92.5424,-7.09489,-25037.4,32022.5,-10004.3,3019.17
1157.46,-1077.94,-0.580522,-78.9482,32022.5,-57353.5,36280.6,-10949.6
166.577,-103.776,1494.41,-1557.21,-10004.3,36280.6,-63053.2,36776.9
-34.4753,-22.407,-1586.37,1643.25,3019.17,-10949.6,36776.9,-28846.5
-22840.1,29254.3,-9328.5,2914.31,-1289.57,1157.46,166.577,-34.4753
29254.3,-51067,31724.8,-9912.15,1204.12,-1077.94,-103.776,-22.407
-9328.5,31724.8,-54591.9,32195.6,92.5424,-0.580522,1494.41,-1586.37
2914.31,-9912.15,32195.6,-25197.7,-7.09489,-78.9482,-1557.21,1643.25

and

=

Code:
0,0,0,0,1875.81,0,0,0
0,5019.07,0,0,0,22535.3,0,0
0,0,-5019.07,0,0,0,22535.3,0
0,0,0,0,0,0,0,937.905
835.2,0,0,0,0,0,0,0
0,5003.02,0,0,0,5019.07,0,0
0,0,5003.02,0,0,0,-5019.07,0
0,0,0,417.6,0,0,0,0

Using mathematica I get for lambdas {75.1098, 35.2687, 34.3082, 15.2013, 4.3281, 1.35478,
5.38827*10^-154, -2.06904*10^-154}

The last two eigenvalues are zero. That made me think that two equations are redundant. I confirmed that with mathematica. Rank of A is 6.

How can I reduce the system? I tried deleting two rows and columns, but for all the combinations the matrix B is singular.
Notice that the first and last column/row of the matrix B have only one value different from zero. Is anything I can do to exploit that?

Best
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think having two zero eigenvalues is an issue? If A has rank 6 and B has rank 4, that is what you would expect to get.

For example if A was the mass matrix and B the stiffness matrix of a structure, the two zero eigenvalues just mean the system can move freely in two (generalized) directions. There is nothing "unphysical" or unreasonable about that.

You don't say what your matrices represent, but if they come from a physics problem the zero eigenvalues probably have a physical interpretation.
 
AlephZero said:
Why do you think having two zero eigenvalues is an issue? If A has rank 6 and B has rank 4, that is what you would expect to get.

For example if A was the mass matrix and B the stiffness matrix of a structure, the two zero eigenvalues just mean the system can move freely in two (generalized) directions. There is nothing "unphysical" or unreasonable about that.

You don't say what your matrices represent, but if they come from a physics problem the zero eigenvalues probably have a physical interpretation.

Thanks AlephZero. The zero eigenvalues do have a physical interpretation and it is related to what you said.

Those special cases are treated separately and I do not need the associated eigenvectors.

What I do up to now is solve the 8x8 system and then remove the zero eigenvalues. I want to know if there is a way reduce the system before calculating the eigenvalues so as to have the nontrivial eigenvalues.

Best
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K