A How to intuitively think of translations and Galilean boosts commuting?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter binbagsss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Galilean
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the intuitive understanding of translations and Galilean boosts in physics, emphasizing that the speed and direction of an object are independent of the observer's location. It clarifies that while spatial translations commute, Galilean boosts and time translations do not, as demonstrated through analogies involving car acceleration. Participants note that during acceleration, one is not in an inertial frame, and thus the concept of a boost applies only when moving at constant speed. The conversation also touches on the implications of the Bargmann algebra in relation to Galilean transformations. Overall, the key takeaway is that understanding these concepts requires careful consideration of reference frames and the nature of transformations.
binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
how to think of translations and Galilean boosts commuting intuitively
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How fast something is going and in what direction doesn't depend on where you are.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby and FactChecker
Depends on your definition of intuitive, but if a translation is T(X) = X + A and a boost is B(X) = X + Vt, then TB(X) = BT(X) = X + Vt + A because addition commutes.
 
  • Like
Likes weirdoguy and Ibix
Moderator's note: Thread moved to the Classical Physics forum since that is the proper context for discussion of Galilean boosts.
 
binbagsss said:
translations
Note that this has to mean spatial translations for your statement in the OP to be true. Galilean boosts and time translations do not commute.
 
  • Like
Likes weirdoguy and FactChecker
One builds intuition by working through problems. There is no magic trick to it.
 
Imagine yourself in a car. You press accelerator pedal (this is boost), then you wait for some time (=time translation). Obviously, after these two transformations you'll find yourself far from the place you've started from.

In reverse order: You wait for some time (=time translation), then you step on accelerator (=boost). You have not moved.

Conclusion: time translations and boosts do not commute.
Eugene.
 
meopemuk said:
press accelerator pedal (this is boost)

How?
 
  • #10
By definition, boost is a transformation that changes velocity of reference frame.

When I press accelerator pedal, velocity of my car changes. Then the inertial reference frame associated with me and my car experiences a boost.

Eugene.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes PeroK and weirdoguy
  • #11
meopemuk said:
By definition, boost is a transformation that changes velocity of reference frame.

When I press accelerator pedal, velocity of my car changes. Then the inertial reference frame associated with me and my car experiences a boost.

Eugene.
During the acceleration itself you're not experiencing what physicists would call a 'boost'. Inertial observers are connected by 'boosts'. During acceleration you're not an inertial observer.
 
  • #12
meopemuk said:
By definition, boost is a transformation that changes velocity of reference frame.

No, boost changes inertial reference frame to a different inertial one.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
weirdoguy said:
No, boost changes inertial reference frame to a different inertial one.
True, during acceleration I am not an inertial observer. But after I released the accelerator pedal, I move with a constant speed and I may regard myself as an inertial observer, which is boosted with respect to my previous state.

I agree that this is not a perfect analogy for boost, but not a bad one if we disregard the (short) time during which I am stepping on the gas pedal.

Perhaps, a better analogy would be to jump (mentally) to another car that passes nearby.

Eugene.
 
  • #14
haushofer said:
Actually, they don't commute in the Bargmann algebra :P See e.g.

https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.1145
From the abstract I see the Bargmann algebra is assoicated with the centrally extended Galilean algebra. Could you give, very briefly, implications of what this means compared to the question I asked which was on, what I assume can be referred to as the unextended Galilean group. thanks
 
  • #15
PeterDonis said:
Note that this has to mean spatial translations for your statement in the OP to be true. Galilean boosts and time translations do not commute.
ofc.
 
  • #16
meopemuk said:
True, during acceleration I am not an inertial observer. But after I released the accelerator pedal, I move with a constant speed and I may regard myself as an inertial observer, which is boosted with respect to my previous state.

I agree that this is not a perfect analogy for boost, but not a bad one if we disregard the (short) time during which I am stepping on the gas pedal.

Perhaps, a better analogy would be to jump (mentally) to another car that passes nearby.

Eugene.
A reference frame is not an object like a car that has a single trajectory. A boost is not a physical process like acceleration of an object. A boost is a mapping or transformation from one reference frame to another.
 
Back
Top