How to list arXiv papers on NSF final report

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around how to appropriately list arXiv papers in the "publications and products" section of an NSF final report. Participants explore the categorization of arXiv articles and the challenges associated with providing descriptions for multiple entries.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether to categorize arXiv articles under "internet dissemination," noting that arXiv is not a personal domain and may not fit the definition of a website.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about listing arXiv papers under "journal publications," as arXiv is not a journal.
  • Concerns are raised about the "other specific product" category, as it seems to imply practical products rather than academic papers.
  • There is a discussion about how to provide a single description for multiple arXiv papers, with one participant considering whether to summarize them under a general idea or to create separate sections for each paper.
  • Several participants emphasize that the NSF provided specific instructions on how to list the papers, suggesting adherence to those guidelines.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to follow NSF's guidance but express differing opinions on how best to present the arXiv papers within the provided categories. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the most appropriate categorization and description strategy.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the NSF's instructions, particularly regarding the requirement for a single description for multiple papers and the ambiguity in categorizing arXiv articles.

causalset
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I had NSF fellowship for the period of 2009 -- 2011, and now I have to fill out final report. When I am trying to fill out the section "publications and products" of my NSF report, it gives me four options:

a) Journal publications
b) Books
c) Internet dissemination
d) Other specific product

My question is which of these should I list my arXiv articles under? Should I list it under "c" (internet dissemination)? I am not sure whehter this is entirely appropriate since that section asks me for internet websites, but when I make arXiv post it is not my own domain; the domain is still arXiv.org On the other hand, if I list it under "journals" it doesn't seem appropriate either since arXiv is not really a journal. Finally, "other specific product" seems to be asking me about practical products people can use which again feels like it is inappropriate since my papers are not really "products".

I tried to list it under "Internet dissemination", but then I encountered another problem while doing so. Namely, it asks me for ONE website, but I have several arXiv posts. When I called NSF and asked them this question, they told me to separate them by semicolons. But then I asked them how about description below: what can I do to make separate description for each of the arXiv posts? Their answer was that there is nothing that can be done about it: it has to be one description for all of them. This makes me wonder again whether perhaps it was not appropriate section to list arZXiv under.

Anyway, let me give you a description of how I go there:

1. Log in under PI/co-PI management (I am considered to be my own PI)

2. Go to "Award and reporting functions"

3. Go to "Project reports system"

4. Click on the award number that they list

5. Click on "create/edit"

6. Click "continue"

7. Click on "publications and products"

8. There you will see the options a-d I talked about above

Anyway please let me know what is best to do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You called the NSF, and they told you exactly what to do. Now do it.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
You called the NSF, and they told you exactly what to do. Now do it.

I mean wahat they told me to do was to list all of my arXiv papers with semicolons and write ONE summary for all of them. My question is this: should I

A. Present a general idea and mention these different arXiv papers in context of this general idea

or

B. Have few different "chapters" of my essay, one per each arXiv?
 
You called the NSF, and they told you exactly what to do. If you don't understand it, ask them for clarification, and then do it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
494
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K