I How to measure the surface area of an arbitrary 3D object (1 Viewer)

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

bob012345

Gold Member
269
22
I'm looking for an easy way to get the surface area of an arbitrary shaped 3D object. Getting the volume is easy by water displacement. What about area? Any neat tricks? We know different shapes can have the same volume and thus different surface areas so it's not a trivial problem. The purpose is for estimating surface area of 3D printed plastic parts which will undergo copper plating. Thanks!
 

sophiecentaur

Science Advisor
Gold Member
22,490
3,440
Good question. Not so hard to do with lots of images and a clever computer algorithm, I guess. There are algorithms that will construct a surface Net of triangles from a digital 3D image - probably not a difficult bit of geometry.
I can't think of an old fashioned analogue method that would give an accurate answer. Perhaps if you could invent a way of laying down a thin , uniform layer that would fit over the object, then find out the volume of material used. A uniform layer could perhaps be obtained by using interferometry
 

bob012345

Gold Member
269
22
Good question. Not so hard to do with lots of images and a clever computer algorithm, I guess. There are algorithms that will construct a surface Net of triangles from a digital 3D image - probably not a difficult bit of geometry.
I can't think of an old fashioned analogue method that would give an accurate answer. Perhaps if you could invent a way of laying down a thin , uniform layer that would fit over the object, then find out the volume of material used. A uniform layer could perhaps be obtained by using interferometry
Thanks. I'm hoping to hear of or figure out a method without computers or sophisticated devices. Your uniform layer could be wax by dipping and then weight it. One difficulty is the inside would follow the hills and valleys but the outside might be smoother thus getting an approximation of the surface area. Of course, I can just estimate the area but that's not as much fun. What would Archimedes do?
 
Last edited:
5,941
3,220
I can't think of an old fashioned analogue method that would give an accurate answer. Perhaps if you could invent a way of laying down a thin , uniform layer that would fit over the object, then find out the volume of material used. A uniform layer could perhaps be obtained by using interferometry
The OP didn't say how accurate he needs to be. Just dunk it in paint, measure the amount of paint used. Compare that with dunking an object of known surface area.
 

bob012345

Gold Member
269
22
The OP didn't say how accurate he needs to be. Just dunk it in paint, measure the amount of paint used. Compare that with dunking an object of known surface area.
Accuracy should be one percent or so. I think that's close enough. Your paint idea idea Anorlunda is brilliant but I would need to act fast and not allow it to dry first. Or maybe, that won't matter. Thanks!
 
5,941
3,220
You could also use oil instead of paint. The accuracy challenge comes if the coating is not uniform, say thicker at the bottom. That is why you want a viscous fluid with high surface tension.
 
57
23
You could use strips of masking tape or food service film. Then, measure the tape or film. Alternatively, cut the tape or film into pieces of known area and fill in whatever gaps are left over and measure the oddball pieces. Just be careful to not stretch it.
 

sophiecentaur

Science Advisor
Gold Member
22,490
3,440
You could also use oil instead of paint. The accuracy challenge comes if the coating is not uniform, say thicker at the bottom. That is why you want a viscous fluid with high surface tension.
Dipping could result in non-uniform 'runs', which cause me to reject the idea initially. Perhaps dipping in a container full of small spheres (identical) could result in a uniform layer with only the edge effects at edges. Then it would just be 'quantisation error'.
 

jrmichler

Science Advisor
622
513
You could use strips of masking tape or food service film. Then, measure the tape or film. Alternatively, cut the tape or film into pieces of known area and fill in whatever gaps are left over and measure the oddball pieces. Just be careful to not stretch it.
You don't need to measure the tape. Just weigh the part on a sensitive balance before and after, then weigh a known size piece of the tape.
 

bob012345

Gold Member
269
22
You don't need to measure the tape. Just weigh the part on a sensitive balance before and after, then weigh a known size piece of the tape.
Yes, if one can tolerate lower resolution.
 

jrmichler

Science Advisor
622
513
Use an analytical balance with 0.1 milligram resolution. You will have your 1% error tolerance if you use at least 10 milligrams of tape to cover the object.
 

bob012345

Gold Member
269
22
How would you tape objects that look like these?

View attachment 228634
I wanted to reply with a picture of a 3D printed test device called a 'Benchy Boat' so you can all see the resolution and structure of a typical print we want to plate but I can't figure out how to add an image.
 
5,941
3,220
I can't figure out how to add an image.
There are two ways, (assuming you're using a web browser on a tablet or desktop, and not the PF mobile app.)
  1. If the image is on your own computer, use the UPLOAD button next to POST REPLY and PREVIEW. After upload, then a new thing appears on the bottom saying THUMNAIL or FULL IMAGE. Click FULL IMAGE.
  2. If you just have a URL for the image, click on the image icon (looks like a mountain range) on the editing toolbar. Then you can paste the URL.
slask.png
 

Attachments

bob012345

Gold Member
269
22
image.jpg
There are two ways, (assuming you're using a web browser on a tablet or desktop, and not the PF mobile app.)
  1. If the image is on your own computer, use the UPLOAD button next to POST REPLY and PREVIEW. After upload, then a new thing appears on the bottom saying THUMNAIL or FULL IMAGE. Click FULL IMAGE.
  2. If you just have a URL for the image, click on the image icon (looks like a mountain range) on the editing toolbar. Then you can paste the URL.
View attachment 228636
Thanks! As can be seen, the surface isn't only on the 'outside'.
 

Attachments

sophiecentaur

Science Advisor
Gold Member
22,490
3,440
If the object was produced on a 3D printer then the original data is the best source of information about its surface area.
If you want to plate the object then I would imagine the plating thickness would vary quite a bit, according to the position of parts of the surface. Is it a conducting material or will you need to spray the model with a conductor first?
 

Grinkle

Gold Member
625
167
plastic parts which will undergo copper plating.
What is the process for plating the parts?

The suggestions seem to be along the lines of "plate the part with something easy to plate with" but if the practical application of this is to predict plating costs, maybe you just need to plate a part and see how much Cu it required. Looking at that boat, I imagine that viscous material won't easily wet the insides of the smaller geometries on the boat, and as already noted, non-viscous material won't be uniform in coverage.

This is a very engaging problem, by the way. I hope we come to a practical answer!
 

bob012345

Gold Member
269
22
If the object was produced on a 3D printer then the original data is the best source of information about its surface area.
If you want to plate the object then I would imagine the plating thickness would vary quite a bit, according to the position of parts of the surface. Is it a conducting material or will you need to spray the model with a conductor first?
It's ABS plastic. We will have to apply conductive paint first. The paint could be used to estimate the surface area too. It's also true if the original data the printer printed from is available, the surface area should be retrieved. I'm assuming I won't always have that data available.
 
Last edited:

bob012345

Gold Member
269
22
What is the process for plating the parts?

The suggestions seem to be along the lines of "plate the part with something easy to plate with" but if the practical application of this is to predict plating costs, maybe you just need to plate a part and see how much Cu it required. Looking at that boat, I imagine that viscous material won't easily wet the insides of the smaller geometries on the boat, and as already noted, non-viscous material won't be uniform in coverage.

This is a very engaging problem, by the way. I hope we come to a practical answer!
Thanks. I'm using Copper Sulfate solution. I'm coating the ABS plastic with a conductive paint. I tried a homemade graphite layer but have no success yet as the resistance seemed too high, in the 240,000 Ohm range.
 

The Physics Forums Way

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top