How to mechanically produce modified SINE wave motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter teliocide
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Piston Sine waves
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on mechanically producing modified SINE wave motion for a piston system, emphasizing the need for a mechanism that extends the time the piston spends at both the top and bottom of its stroke. Participants suggest using a combination of gears and eccentric hubs to achieve a smooth motion profile, referencing harmonic functions such as y = Sin(θ) + Sin(3θ)/10. The proposed solutions include using a crank with an N-tooth planet gear and a concentric fixed gear to generate the desired motion, while avoiding common divisor issues in gear tooth counts to ensure smooth operation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of harmonic motion and Fourier transforms
  • Familiarity with mechanical cam mechanisms and gear systems
  • Knowledge of gear ratios and their implications on motion
  • Experience with mechanical design principles, particularly in piston systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research mechanical cam mechanisms and their applications in wave motion
  • Explore gear design principles to avoid common divisor issues in tooth counts
  • Investigate the use of eccentric hubs in mechanical systems for smooth motion
  • Study the mathematical modeling of harmonic functions for mechanical applications
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, designers of piston-driven systems, and hobbyists interested in advanced mechanical motion control techniques.

  • #31
berkeman said:
Was it something I said...?
Under the circumstances, the trigger could be anything.
We should pray for an early monsoon, and a welcome back.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
Baluncore said:
Under the circumstances, the trigger could be anything.
Do you see anything in our responses that may have bothered the OP? The thread seemed to be going okay to me...
 
  • #33
There were the usual "reading and understanding the question" problems, and some wrong assumptions while "getting to know the OP's capability".

It was typical light-hearted banter, in parallel with the topic, nothing directly personal, but our interpretation is not subject to the stress of inescapable and debilitating heat.
 
  • #34
FWIW, I did get the impression that this overall thread was being rather more derogatory/aggresive than usual here.
 
  • #35
berkeman said:
Was it something I said...?
Likely. You are those most abrasive member I have found on this forum! Lol. J/K. I can't imagine you can be at fault. I might be though, stuff I say always gets taken the wrong way. And I didn't even post in this thread. That's how bad I am.
-
Seriously though, some people just have a thinner skin to start with...
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
17K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K