The discussion revolves around the mechanical production of modified sine wave motion, specifically focusing on extending the time a piston spends at the top and bottom of its stroke. Participants explore various mechanical arrangements and mechanisms to achieve this motion, contrasting them with electrical solutions.
Participants express differing views on the best mechanical solutions, with some advocating for traditional mechanical methods while others suggest electrical alternatives. There is no consensus on a single approach, and various competing models and ideas are presented throughout the discussion.
Participants note limitations in achieving ideal motion profiles with mechanical systems, including the need for compromises in design and the effects of speed on mechanical performance. The discussion also highlights unresolved mathematical considerations regarding gear ratios and harmonic contributions.
Individuals interested in mechanical engineering, particularly those focused on motion control and mechanical design, may find this discussion relevant.
Under the circumstances, the trigger could be anything.berkeman said:Was it something I said...?
Do you see anything in our responses that may have bothered the OP? The thread seemed to be going okay to me...Baluncore said:Under the circumstances, the trigger could be anything.
Likely. You are those most abrasive member I have found on this forum! Lol. J/K. I can't imagine you can be at fault. I might be though, stuff I say always gets taken the wrong way. And I didn't even post in this thread. That's how bad I am.berkeman said:Was it something I said...?