Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

How to Normalize a simulated dataset to fit the actual dataset?

  1. Feb 19, 2012 #1
    Can someone tell me how I can 'normalize' my dataset?

    My scenario is as follows.

    I have two datasets, A (real-life data) and B (simulated data).

    Dataset A contains 4 numerical values (from an actual experiment):
    -> E.g. 4 leaves from a binary tree each assigned with values 12.5,13.5,20.0 and 45.0.

    Dataset B contains 40 numerical values (from a simulation done by the computer):
    -> E.g. 40 leaves from a total of 10 binary trees where each tree produces 4 leaves with randomly assigned numerical values for each leaf.

    For both datasets, I have computed their respective cumulative frequencies and plotted their respective charts using MS Excel e.g. [Cumulative frequencies of leaf values VS Leaf values]. This was to observe how similar/different are both of these data sets, where the smaller the vertical displacement between the two plots implies that both datasets are less different.

    I was instructed to normalize my data from Dataset B and re-plot the chart for a better comparison between set A and set B.

    How can I do this (and why is this important?)?

    An example based on the situation described here will help a great deal. Thanks in advance.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 19, 2012 #2

    Stephen Tashi

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Unfortunately "normalize" is an ambiguous instruction. It might mean to convert each data value [itex] v [/itex] to it's "z-score" by computing [itex] \frac{v - \mu}{\sigma} [/itex] where [itex] \mu [/itex] is the mean of the sample in question ( real or simulated) and [itex] \sigma [/itex] is the standard deviation of the sample.

    It could mean something as simplistic as converting each data value [itex] v [/itex] to a sort of ranking by computing [itex] \frac{v - v_{min}}{v_{max} - v_{min} } [/itex] where [itex] v_{max} [/itex] and [itex] v_{min} [/itex] are, respectively, the max and min values in the sample.

    We'd have to know more about what the data and the simulation represent to know what makes sense - (and we'd have to assume the person who told to do this gave sensible advice!). If you use z-scores you can probably defend that choice as a common meaning for "normalize". If both your historgrams had a roughly a bell shaped appearance, I'd guess that this was was your advisor meant.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: How to Normalize a simulated dataset to fit the actual dataset?
  1. Cube fitting (Replies: 0)

  2. NH normal => H normal (Replies: 2)

Loading...