How to obtain the determinant of the Curl in cylindrical coordinates?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the curl of a vector field in cylindrical coordinates. Participants explore different approaches to derive the determinant used in the curl operation, addressing the complexities and variations in the formulation of the curl in this coordinate system.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a vector field in cylindrical coordinates and attempts to calculate the curl using a determinant, arriving at a specific expression for the curl.
  • Another participant notes discrepancies between their determinant calculation and those found online, expressing uncertainty about the correctness of their approach.
  • Several participants discuss the nature of the curl operation, with one emphasizing that the del operator does not behave like a traditional vector in an orthonormal basis.
  • There is mention of the general formula for the curl in cylindrical coordinates, which includes a factor of \( \frac{1}{r} \) and a determinant involving the components of the vector field.
  • One participant suggests that applying the Jacobian might be necessary for transforming the line element from Cartesian to cylindrical coordinates when deriving the curl.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct formulation of the curl in cylindrical coordinates, with no consensus reached on the proper determinant or approach. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct method to derive the curl.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding assumptions about the vector field components and the application of the curl operation in non-Cartesian coordinates. The participants do not fully resolve the mathematical steps involved in the derivation.

SebastianRM
Messages
39
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
Hey guys, I wrote my determinant for directions r, ##\theta##, z. For vectors of the same cylindrical space. So, I proceed to calculate the determinant, but its form is far different from what shown online. How can I derive the proper way.
I have a vector in cylindrical Coordinates:
$$\vec{V} = \left < 0 ,V_{\theta},0 \right> $$
where ##V_\theta = V(r,t)##.

The Del operator in ##\{r,\theta,z\}$ is: $\vec{\nabla} = \left< \frac{\partial}{\partial r}, \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}, \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \right>##

I tried to obtain the curl as follows:
$$\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{V} = \begin{vmatrix} \hat{r}\ & \hat{\theta} & \hat{z} \\ \partial/\partial r & (1/r)\partial/\partial \theta & \partial/\partial z \\ 0 & V_{\theta} & 0 \end{vmatrix} = \left< -\partial V_{\theta}/\partial z, 0 , \partial V_\theta/\partial r \right> = \frac{\partial V_\theta}{\partial r} \hat{z} $$

However i have seen very different determinants for the curl, and I am not sure why my approach is incorrect. How can I derive the proper determinant?

Your time and answers are very appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SebastianRM said:
Summary:: Hey guys, I wrote my determinant for directions r, ##\theta##, z. For vectors of the same cylindrical space. So, I proceed to calculate the determinant, but its form is far different from what shown online. How can I derive the proper way.

I have a vector in cylindrical Coordinates:
$$\vec{V} = \left < 0 ,V_{\theta},0 \right> $$
where ##V_\theta = V(r,t)##.

The Del operator in ##\{r,\theta,z\}$ is: $\vec{\nabla} = \left< \frac{\partial}{\partial r}, \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}, \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \right>##

I tried to obtain the curl as follows:
$$\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{V} = \begin{vmatrix} \hat{r}\ & \hat{\theta} & \hat{z} \\ \partial/\partial r & (1/r)\partial/\partial \theta & \partial/\partial z \\ 0 & V_{\theta} & 0 \end{vmatrix} = \left< -\partial V_{\theta}/\partial z, 0 , \partial V_\theta/\partial r \right> = \frac{\partial V_\theta}{\partial r} \hat{z} $$

The resultant vector would be:
$$<

However i have seen very different determinants for the curl, and I am not sure why my approach is incorrect. How can I derive the proper determinant?

Your time and answers are very appreciated.
The general formula for cylindrical coordinate is as follows:
$$\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{V} = \frac{1}{r}\begin{vmatrix} \hat{r}\ & r\hat{\theta} & \hat{z} \\ \partial/\partial r & \partial/\partial \theta & \partial/\partial z \\ V_{r} & V_{\theta} & V_{z} \end{vmatrix} $$
Because ##V_r## and ##V_z## are zero, the resultant vector would be:
$$\frac{1}{r} < -\frac{\partial (rV_{\theta})}{\partial z}\hat r ,0,\frac{\partial (rV_{\theta})}{\partial r} \hat z >$$
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: SebastianRM
I was trying to derive the determinant itself, I know that is the correct form. I was using the definition of a cross product to do the curl; however, the curl is not really a cross product of vectors in an orthonormal basis.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tony Hau
SebastianRM said:
I was trying to derive the determinant itself, I know that is the correct form. I was using the definition of a cross product to do the curl; however, the curl is not really a cross product of vectors in an orthonormal basis.
The del operator is not a vector that crosses with vectors, although it resembles the property of vectors. I am sorry I am not an expert who can explain clearly to you about it, but here is a derive of the curl in other coordinates:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Del_in_cylindrical_and_spherical_coordinates

The definition of curl is: $$\nabla \times \vec A = \lim_{dS \rightarrow 0}\frac{\int \vec A \cdot dl}{\iint dS}$$, which is shrinking the path integral of ##\vec A## over a path ##dl## enclosing an infinitely small area ##dS##

I suppose you need to apply the Jacobian to transform the ##dl## element from Cartesian coordinate to other coordinates in deriving the curl for other coordinates.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: SebastianRM

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K