I How to obtain the determinant of the Curl in cylindrical coordinates?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the curl of a vector field in cylindrical coordinates, specifically for the vector \(\vec{V} = \left < 0 ,V_{\theta},0 \right>\). The initial attempt to derive the curl using the determinant of the Del operator resulted in a different expression than expected, leading to confusion about the correct form. The correct formula for the curl in cylindrical coordinates includes a factor of \(\frac{1}{r}\) and involves the terms \(V_r\) and \(V_z\), which are zero in this case. It is emphasized that the curl is not simply a cross product, and understanding the Jacobian transformation is essential for deriving the correct determinant. The discussion concludes that proper application of the determinant and understanding the nature of the Del operator are crucial for accurate calculations.
SebastianRM
Messages
39
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
Hey guys, I wrote my determinant for directions r, ##\theta##, z. For vectors of the same cylindrical space. So, I proceed to calculate the determinant, but its form is far different from what shown online. How can I derive the proper way.
I have a vector in cylindrical Coordinates:
$$\vec{V} = \left < 0 ,V_{\theta},0 \right> $$
where ##V_\theta = V(r,t)##.

The Del operator in ##\{r,\theta,z\}$ is: $\vec{\nabla} = \left< \frac{\partial}{\partial r}, \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}, \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \right>##

I tried to obtain the curl as follows:
$$\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{V} = \begin{vmatrix} \hat{r}\ & \hat{\theta} & \hat{z} \\ \partial/\partial r & (1/r)\partial/\partial \theta & \partial/\partial z \\ 0 & V_{\theta} & 0 \end{vmatrix} = \left< -\partial V_{\theta}/\partial z, 0 , \partial V_\theta/\partial r \right> = \frac{\partial V_\theta}{\partial r} \hat{z} $$

However i have seen very different determinants for the curl, and I am not sure why my approach is incorrect. How can I derive the proper determinant?

Your time and answers are very appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SebastianRM said:
Summary:: Hey guys, I wrote my determinant for directions r, ##\theta##, z. For vectors of the same cylindrical space. So, I proceed to calculate the determinant, but its form is far different from what shown online. How can I derive the proper way.

I have a vector in cylindrical Coordinates:
$$\vec{V} = \left < 0 ,V_{\theta},0 \right> $$
where ##V_\theta = V(r,t)##.

The Del operator in ##\{r,\theta,z\}$ is: $\vec{\nabla} = \left< \frac{\partial}{\partial r}, \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}, \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \right>##

I tried to obtain the curl as follows:
$$\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{V} = \begin{vmatrix} \hat{r}\ & \hat{\theta} & \hat{z} \\ \partial/\partial r & (1/r)\partial/\partial \theta & \partial/\partial z \\ 0 & V_{\theta} & 0 \end{vmatrix} = \left< -\partial V_{\theta}/\partial z, 0 , \partial V_\theta/\partial r \right> = \frac{\partial V_\theta}{\partial r} \hat{z} $$

The resultant vector would be:
$$<

However i have seen very different determinants for the curl, and I am not sure why my approach is incorrect. How can I derive the proper determinant?

Your time and answers are very appreciated.
The general formula for cylindrical coordinate is as follows:
$$\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{V} = \frac{1}{r}\begin{vmatrix} \hat{r}\ & r\hat{\theta} & \hat{z} \\ \partial/\partial r & \partial/\partial \theta & \partial/\partial z \\ V_{r} & V_{\theta} & V_{z} \end{vmatrix} $$
Because ##V_r## and ##V_z## are zero, the resultant vector would be:
$$\frac{1}{r} < -\frac{\partial (rV_{\theta})}{\partial z}\hat r ,0,\frac{\partial (rV_{\theta})}{\partial r} \hat z >$$
 
  • Informative
Likes SebastianRM
I was trying to derive the determinant itself, I know that is the correct form. I was using the definition of a cross product to do the curl; however, the curl is not really a cross product of vectors in an orthonormal basis.
 
  • Like
Likes Tony Hau
SebastianRM said:
I was trying to derive the determinant itself, I know that is the correct form. I was using the definition of a cross product to do the curl; however, the curl is not really a cross product of vectors in an orthonormal basis.
The del operator is not a vector that crosses with vectors, although it resembles the property of vectors. I am sorry I am not an expert who can explain clearly to you about it, but here is a derive of the curl in other coordinates:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Del_in_cylindrical_and_spherical_coordinates

The definition of curl is: $$\nabla \times \vec A = \lim_{dS \rightarrow 0}\frac{\int \vec A \cdot dl}{\iint dS}$$, which is shrinking the path integral of ##\vec A## over a path ##dl## enclosing an infinitely small area ##dS##

I suppose you need to apply the Jacobian to transform the ##dl## element from Cartesian coordinate to other coordinates in deriving the curl for other coordinates.
 
  • Informative
Likes SebastianRM

Similar threads