Undergrad How to obtain the determinant of the Curl in cylindrical coordinates?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the curl of a vector field in cylindrical coordinates, specifically for the vector \(\vec{V} = \left< 0, V_{\theta}, 0 \right>\) where \(V_{\theta} = V(r,t)\). The user initially derived the curl using the Del operator but encountered discrepancies with established results. The correct formula for the curl in cylindrical coordinates is given as \(\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{V} = \frac{1}{r}\begin{vmatrix} \hat{r} & r\hat{\theta} & \hat{z} \\ \partial/\partial r & \partial/\partial \theta & \partial/\partial z \\ V_{r} & V_{\theta} & V_{z} \end{vmatrix}\), leading to the conclusion that the user must account for the Jacobian when transforming coordinates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Cylindrical coordinate systems
  • Vector calculus, specifically the curl operation
  • Understanding of the Del operator in vector fields
  • Jacobian transformations in multivariable calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the curl in cylindrical coordinates using the Jacobian.
  • Learn about the properties of the Del operator and its application in different coordinate systems.
  • Explore vector calculus concepts, focusing on the curl and divergence.
  • Review examples of vector fields in cylindrical coordinates to solidify understanding.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those working with fluid dynamics or electromagnetism, where vector fields in cylindrical coordinates are prevalent.

SebastianRM
Messages
39
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
Hey guys, I wrote my determinant for directions r, ##\theta##, z. For vectors of the same cylindrical space. So, I proceed to calculate the determinant, but its form is far different from what shown online. How can I derive the proper way.
I have a vector in cylindrical Coordinates:
$$\vec{V} = \left < 0 ,V_{\theta},0 \right> $$
where ##V_\theta = V(r,t)##.

The Del operator in ##\{r,\theta,z\}$ is: $\vec{\nabla} = \left< \frac{\partial}{\partial r}, \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}, \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \right>##

I tried to obtain the curl as follows:
$$\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{V} = \begin{vmatrix} \hat{r}\ & \hat{\theta} & \hat{z} \\ \partial/\partial r & (1/r)\partial/\partial \theta & \partial/\partial z \\ 0 & V_{\theta} & 0 \end{vmatrix} = \left< -\partial V_{\theta}/\partial z, 0 , \partial V_\theta/\partial r \right> = \frac{\partial V_\theta}{\partial r} \hat{z} $$

However i have seen very different determinants for the curl, and I am not sure why my approach is incorrect. How can I derive the proper determinant?

Your time and answers are very appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SebastianRM said:
Summary:: Hey guys, I wrote my determinant for directions r, ##\theta##, z. For vectors of the same cylindrical space. So, I proceed to calculate the determinant, but its form is far different from what shown online. How can I derive the proper way.

I have a vector in cylindrical Coordinates:
$$\vec{V} = \left < 0 ,V_{\theta},0 \right> $$
where ##V_\theta = V(r,t)##.

The Del operator in ##\{r,\theta,z\}$ is: $\vec{\nabla} = \left< \frac{\partial}{\partial r}, \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}, \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \right>##

I tried to obtain the curl as follows:
$$\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{V} = \begin{vmatrix} \hat{r}\ & \hat{\theta} & \hat{z} \\ \partial/\partial r & (1/r)\partial/\partial \theta & \partial/\partial z \\ 0 & V_{\theta} & 0 \end{vmatrix} = \left< -\partial V_{\theta}/\partial z, 0 , \partial V_\theta/\partial r \right> = \frac{\partial V_\theta}{\partial r} \hat{z} $$

The resultant vector would be:
$$<

However i have seen very different determinants for the curl, and I am not sure why my approach is incorrect. How can I derive the proper determinant?

Your time and answers are very appreciated.
The general formula for cylindrical coordinate is as follows:
$$\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{V} = \frac{1}{r}\begin{vmatrix} \hat{r}\ & r\hat{\theta} & \hat{z} \\ \partial/\partial r & \partial/\partial \theta & \partial/\partial z \\ V_{r} & V_{\theta} & V_{z} \end{vmatrix} $$
Because ##V_r## and ##V_z## are zero, the resultant vector would be:
$$\frac{1}{r} < -\frac{\partial (rV_{\theta})}{\partial z}\hat r ,0,\frac{\partial (rV_{\theta})}{\partial r} \hat z >$$
 
  • Informative
Likes SebastianRM
I was trying to derive the determinant itself, I know that is the correct form. I was using the definition of a cross product to do the curl; however, the curl is not really a cross product of vectors in an orthonormal basis.
 
  • Like
Likes Tony Hau
SebastianRM said:
I was trying to derive the determinant itself, I know that is the correct form. I was using the definition of a cross product to do the curl; however, the curl is not really a cross product of vectors in an orthonormal basis.
The del operator is not a vector that crosses with vectors, although it resembles the property of vectors. I am sorry I am not an expert who can explain clearly to you about it, but here is a derive of the curl in other coordinates:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Del_in_cylindrical_and_spherical_coordinates

The definition of curl is: $$\nabla \times \vec A = \lim_{dS \rightarrow 0}\frac{\int \vec A \cdot dl}{\iint dS}$$, which is shrinking the path integral of ##\vec A## over a path ##dl## enclosing an infinitely small area ##dS##

I suppose you need to apply the Jacobian to transform the ##dl## element from Cartesian coordinate to other coordinates in deriving the curl for other coordinates.
 
  • Informative
Likes SebastianRM

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
999
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K