How to Prove Recurrence Relations by Induction?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a specific recurrence relation, T(n) = 2T(n/2) + n lg n = Θ(n lg² n), using mathematical induction. Participants explore the steps involved in the induction process, including the base case and the inductive step.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the complexity of the problem and seeks guidance on how to approach the proof.
  • Another participant suggests that assuming T(n) is true and then demonstrating that T(n+1) is true constitutes the induction proof.
  • A similar point is reiterated by another participant, emphasizing the need to prove T(1) as the base case before proceeding with the induction.
  • It is noted that T(1) is assumed to be 1 based on the hypothesis provided.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the structure of the proof by induction, including the necessity of proving the base case T(1). However, the discussion does not resolve the specific steps or methods to complete the proof.

Contextual Notes

There is an implicit assumption that the participants understand the principles of mathematical induction, but specific details on how to apply these principles to the given recurrence relation remain unaddressed.

Who May Find This Useful

Students or individuals interested in learning about mathematical induction, particularly in the context of recurrence relations in computer science or mathematics.

needhelp83
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
Prove the following recurrence by induction
T(n) = 2T(n/2) + n lg n = Θ ( n lg^2 n ), T(1) = 1

This to me looks scary and I was wondering if anybody had a heads up on how to solve for this
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose T(n) is true. From that supposition show that T(n+1) is true. That is the proof by induction.
 
CEL said:
Suppose T(n) is true. From that supposition show that T(n+1) is true. That is the proof by induction.
Not forgetting to prove T(1) to be true first as well.
 
Fightfish said:
Not forgetting to prove T(1) to be true first as well.

T(1) is assumed to be 1, by the hypothesis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K