How to prove the convergence of a factorial series using d'Alembert's criterion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter twoflower
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving the convergence of the series ∑(n! / n^n) using d'Alembert's criterion. Initially, the user struggles with the limit of the ratio test, finding it to be 1, which does not provide conclusive evidence for convergence. A correction reveals that the limit actually approaches 1/e, indicating convergence. Participants suggest revisiting d'Alembert's criterion and utilizing the limit of (1 + 1/n)^n as n approaches infinity. The user ultimately acknowledges the correct limit, confirming the series converges.
twoflower
Messages
363
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

suppose the following sum:

<br /> \sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} \frac{n!}{n^{n}}<br />

I had a feeling it should converge, but I can't find a way how to prove that. I tried d'Alembert's criterion:

<br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n} &lt; 1 \Rightarrow \sum a_{n} converges<br />

But the limit is 1 so it doesn't give anything. In fact, if I were able to prove that

<br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sqrt[n]{n!} = 1<br />

I would have it. But I don't know how to make a prove of that...Which criterion or rule should I use here?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
twoflower said:
In fact, if I were able to prove that

<br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sqrt[n]{n!} = 1<br />

I would have it.

Whoops, the limit isn't 1, it is infinity...
 
Check d'Alembert again.
\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} |\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}| is smaller than 1.

Hint: Make use of: \left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^n \to e as n \to \infty
 
Galileo said:
Check d'Alembert again.
\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} |\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}| is smaller than 1.

Hint: Make use of: \left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^n \to e as n \to \infty

Thank you Galileo, now I can see it goes to 1/e.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K