How to Reach a 8.6 Lightyear Star in 60 Years?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DeverX
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the theoretical possibilities of reaching a star located 8.6 light-years away within a time frame of 60 years. Participants explore various propulsion methods, the feasibility of current technology, and speculative concepts from science fiction, while considering realistic constraints and challenges associated with interstellar travel.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates that traveling to an 8.6 light-year star at a speed of 200 km/s would take approximately 1290 years, deeming this impractical.
  • Some participants suggest that a slingshot maneuver is impractical due to the need for deceleration upon arrival.
  • Wormholes and Stargates are dismissed as options due to the lack of understanding on how to create them.
  • Warp drives are mentioned as a potential option, but questions remain about their functionality.
  • Another participant emphasizes that if the discussion is grounded in realistic physics, the only viable option is some form of rocket propulsion, which would need to be substantial in size.
  • Some participants propose that a generation ship could be necessary if adhering to realistic constraints.
  • Discussion includes various rocket types, such as ion and nuclear propulsion, as well as more exotic concepts like the Alcubierre drive.
  • One participant references a fictional work suggesting biological/electronic technology for interstellar travel, indicating a blend of realism and science fiction.
  • Another participant mentions Frank Herbert's "Dune" series as an example of overcoming interstellar distances through fictional means.
  • There is a proposal that a fusion-powered rocket could achieve the necessary speeds with a specific momentum of 0.1c, suggesting a mass ratio that is plausible with current rocket technology.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus on a single viable method for interstellar travel. Some focus on realistic propulsion methods, while others explore speculative concepts from science fiction. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to achieve the goal of reaching the star within the specified time frame.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in current technology and the challenges of deceleration upon arrival. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of realism versus science fiction in the context of interstellar travel.

DeverX
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
So let's say i wanne go to a 8.6 Lightyear distant star...
And the fastes thing we launched so fare can go 200km/s...
My calculation says that we gona need 1290 years to get there...
Thats just not practical...
Does anyone has a "theoretically" working way to get there in let's say 60 years...
A Slingshot seems not to be practical... because we need to slow down a lot at the destination...
Wormhole is also disqualified because of "how to make one"...
Stargate... see Wormhole plus there is none at the destination...
Warpdrive aka Space distortion drive could be an option but how does it really work...
Lightspeed... Einstein says no...

Anyone any other idee?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this a Sci-Fi question?
 
Ahm... yes kind of... but i wanne keep it realisitic so i thought i put it in here... sorry when i went wrong...
 
DeverX said:
And the fastes thing we launched so fare can go 200km/s...

Nothing has ever been launched from Earth at that speed! That's about 40x orbital velocity in LEO! The only reason the Parker Solar Probe reaches this speed is because it falls towards the Sun on its way to closest approach. Anything launched outwards from the solar system will be fighting the Sun's gravity the whole way, decelerating it over time.

DeverX said:
y calculation says that we gona need 1290 years to get there...
Thats just not practical...
Does anyone has a "theoretically" working way to get there in let's say 60 years...
A Slingshot seems not to be practical... because we need to slow down a lot at the destination...
Wormhole is also disqualified because of "how to make one"...
Stargate... see Wormhole plus there is none at the destination...
Warpdrive aka Space distortion drive could be an option but how does it really work...
Lightspeed... Einstein says no...

Anyone any other idee?

If we're talking about sci-fi, just invent some propulsion method. If we're talking realistic physics, then your only choice is to use some sort of rocket. It's going to be very big.
 
If you're thinking sci fi, why bother with a ship at all? Why not just beam yourself there in zero time?
 
realism...
 
DeverX said:
realism...
In this case you will probably need a huge generation ship.
 
If you're stuck on being realistic, your only real bet is some type of rocket. If you want to bend realism a bit, you could go with something like an Alcubierre drive or a wormhole. Note that many different types of rockets exist, so it doesn't have to be a chemical rocket. Ion and nuclear propulsion both exist, as do other more 'exotic' types of drive systems.
 
My old university math teacher published a book purported to be the collected knowledge of Frank Shook, a cable repair person turned bio-technologist, Saucer Wisdom by Rudy Rucker, that explains how to travel these distances via biological/electronic technology.

Frank also shows Rudy how to communicate with saucer beings from the comfort of his TV room who will help design your star drive. All quite realistic if you ever visit Los Gatos, California, just a few kilometers from the Santa Cruz summit, the epicenter of the Loma
Prieta earthquake, and the Scott's Valley mystery spot.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Check out the Frank Herbert "Dune" series of books. He had a great way to overcome interstellar distances with the use of "melange" and special "navigators".
 
  • #11
At constant 1G acceleration / deceleration it would take about 4.6 years to travel 8.6 LY. If using fusion, a 25,000 Kg payload would require over 6 million KG of fuel. If you had some way to cheaply create and then store antimatter it would be easier. There are also schemes to use stationary energy sources in our solar system to project the craft.

http://nathangeffen.webfactional.com/spacetravel/spacetravel.php
 
  • #12
pedro the swift said:
Check out the Frank Herbert "Dune" series of books. He had a great way to overcome interstellar distances with the use of "melange" and special "navigators".
Concur. Herbert had a brilliant idea to combine the means of transportation, forecast, 'computation' (non-human computers were outlawed), religious fervor and recreation in a single substance only available from the deserts of one planet setting up vital conflicts. FTL travel becomes another mercantile trade controlled by guilds.

If simplicity is your goal, consider Heinlein's 'fold ships'. The fundamental problem with interstellar travel is the immense distance between star systems. 'Fold' space so that remote destinations 'touch' and distance problem solved. Heinlein also used teleportation 'gates' in stories where new worlds to explore were the object as opposed to space travel tales.

In other words SF transportation depends on the type of novel. Realistic velocities below light speed require years of travel even with frozen embryos or 'cold sleep' indicating a travel tale or a moving space habitat. If the story concerns fall of empires and major conflicts, transportation becomes a sort of commodity as in Dune. If the story mainly concerns young people on new worlds, transport is largely a given. For example in a modern novel, characters may fly among countries with little to no knowledge of jet aircraft and use phones and electric cars without technical knowledge unless it fits the plot.
 
  • #13
You don't need exotic concepts. A fusion powered rocket motor could do the job. A mass defect of 1 % and an efficiency of 50 % (just to be not completely unrealistic) would result in a specific momentum of 0.1 c. Reaching the required speed of around 0.15 c and finally braking down to zero would be possible with a mass ratio of 18. That is within the typical range of currently used rockets.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
14K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
16K
Replies
3
Views
2K