Average value of sin(i) in radial velocities (exoplanets)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the average value of sin(i) in the context of measuring radial velocities of exoplanets. It highlights that the radial velocity shift is proportional to m*sin(i), where i is the orbital inclination and m is the planet mass. A common approximation suggests multiplying m*sin(i) values by 1.33 to estimate true masses, although some argue that a uniform distribution of i leads to a multiplier of π/2 (approximately 1.57). The discrepancy arises from the assumption of uniformity in inclination angles, which may not reflect observational biases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radial velocity measurements in exoplanet detection
  • Familiarity with the concept of orbital inclination in celestial mechanics
  • Knowledge of statistical distributions, particularly uniform distributions
  • Basic grasp of trigonometric functions, specifically sine
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the average value of sin(i) in astrophysical contexts
  • Explore the implications of inclination angle distributions on exoplanet mass estimates
  • Study the mathematical foundations of radial velocity shifts in planetary systems
  • Investigate observational biases in exoplanet detection methodologies
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and researchers involved in exoplanet studies, particularly those focused on mass estimation and radial velocity analysis.

cahill8
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
When a stars radial velocity is measured in search for a planet, the planet imparts a radial velocity shift proportional to m\sin i\text{ where }i is the orbital inclination of the planet with respect to our line of sight and m is the planet mass. I've heard that even though the inclinations are generally unknown, the true masses can be approximated for a large sample by multiplying m\sin i values by 1.33. I'm wondering where this value comes from?

Assuming a uniform distribution of i, \int^\pi_0 \sin i di/\pi gives a value of 2/\pi implying that the m\sin i should be multiplied by \pi/2 (1.57, opposed to the 1.33 I've seen). Does anyone have a derivation or reference for this number?

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I don't have a derivation for this number, but it seems like your phrase, "Assuming a uniform distribution of i" is where the discrepancy might come about. It could very well be that the i values are weighted in some way, to take into account that some inclination angles are observationally more likely than others.

I mean, for one thing, if i = 0 (or is it pi -- whichever one corresponds to the system being face-on), then there IS no radial component to the planet's velocity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K