Other How to select one from these two books? (Physical Mathematics)

AI Thread Summary
An HDR student in Condensed Matter Physics seeks to improve math skills for physics studies and is considering two books: "Mathematical Physics" by S. Hassani and "Physical Mathematics" by K. Cahill. The discussion highlights that Hassani's book covers a broader range of advanced topics, while Cahill's book includes essential introductory subjects like Statistics, Monte Carlo Methods, and Renormalization. To make an informed choice, it's suggested to review a chapter from each book and create a list of desired topics to guide the selection process. Time efficiency is emphasized, indicating the importance of choosing the book that best aligns with the student's learning needs.
Photonico
Messages
7
Reaction score
3
Dear everyone,

I'm an HDR student in Condensed Matter Physics. I want to enhance my math ability with the aim is learning physics.
I found two books, they seem all fit my purpose.

1. Mathematical Physics 2nd by S.Hassani
2. Physical Mathematics 2nd by K.Cahill

I want to choose one of them to learn because the time is precious. I need some valuable advice about it.

Cheers,
Lu
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hassani covers more topics.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Photonico
Read a chapter from each. Pick the one you learn more from.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50, Demystifier, vanhees71 and 1 other person
malawi_glenn said:
Hassani covers more topics.
I found that Hassani's book has more advanced topics, but Cahill has many introductory topics which are not contained in Hassani's book, such as Statistics, Monte Carlo Methods, and Renormalization...
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and vanhees71
you could do a list of topics that you want to learn, and then do a plan
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Photonico

Thread 'Blennow to follow up Altland?'

TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...
View full post »

Thread 'Books with a more theoretical approach to turbulence and DNS'

I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
View full post »

Similar threads

Other Recommendation for Mathematics for Physicist and Engineers book
Replies
6
Views
2K
Foundations Should I start with Lang's Basic Mathematics or Gelfand's books?
Replies
4
Views
6K
Please recommend a free pdf book about university-level mathematics for me
Replies
5
Views
3K
Cosmology What are some recommended books for studying mathematical physics?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Intro Physics Opinions on books for (self) studies in statistical physics
Replies
21
Views
5K
Astrophysics Question regarding two specific books on stellar structure
Replies
1
Views
1K
Quantum An alternative route to learn mathematics for physics, the "rigorous way"
Replies
6
Views
4K
Books for a friend interested in mathematical physics but...?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Applied Bibliography on integration and ODE/PDE solving techniques for physics
Replies
12
Views
2K
Seeking "Reference" Textbooks in Mathematical Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top