How to Selectively Reduce Fe(III) Without Affecting UO22+?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Questions_14
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the challenge of selectively reducing Fe(III) to Fe(II) without affecting the uranium oxide (UO2+) present. The key point is the comparison of standard reduction potentials: UO2+ has a potential of 0.38 V, while Fe3+ has a higher potential of 0.771 V. This difference allows for the construction of an electrochemical cell where the anode reaction can be set between these two potentials, enabling the reduction of iron without reducing uranium. Additionally, there is a clarification regarding the presence of O2- in water, noting that it would lead to the formation of hydroxide ions (OH-), emphasizing the importance of understanding the correct chemical behavior in solution.
Questions_14
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

I have been searching the web for days now, trying to find a way to selectively reduce Fe(III) to Fe(II) without reducing the uranium oxide (UO22+) present, and was hoping someone with more of a chemistry background could give me some advice on what to try/do.


Cheers
Simon
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Hi, and welcome to PF!

I did some searching on my own, and I think this works.

The reaction UO2+ + e- → U4+ + 2O2- has a standard reduction potential of 0.38 V.

The reaction Fe3+ + e- → Fe2+ has a standard reduction potential of 0.771 V.

Since the iron reaction has a higher potential, you can construct a cell where the anode reaction has a potential higher than 0.38 but lower than 0.771, which will then be spontaneous for the iron reaction but not for the uranium reaction.

http://www.webelements.com/uranium/compounds.html
 
espen180 said:
The reaction UO2+ + e- → U4+ + 2O2- has a standard reduction potential of 0.38 V.

O2- in water solution? That's not the reaction you will observe.

--
 
No, I realize that. Each oxygen ion will immediately deprotinate a water molecule making OH-.

All I really wanted from the reaction was the reduction potential, but you are right of course, it's not the right picture.
 
I came.across a headline and read some of the article, so I was curious. Scientists discover that gold is a 'reactive metal' by accidentally creating a new material in the lab https://www.earth.com/news/discovery-that-gold-is-reactive-metal-by-creating-gold-hydride-in-lab-experiment/ From SLAC - A SLAC team unexpectedly formed gold hydride in an experiment that could pave the way for studying materials under extreme conditions like those found inside certain planets and stars undergoing...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
39K