How to show that this expression with tensors reduces to zero?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that a specific tensor expression reduces to zero, specifically the term involving the second derivatives of coordinates and the metric tensor. The expression in question is derived from the transformation law for connections, leading to the conclusion that the antisymmetry of certain indices combined with the symmetry of the metric tensor results in the product vanishing. Participants emphasize the importance of correctly handling dummy indices and the implications of the metric's symmetry in tensor calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Tensor calculus fundamentals
  • Understanding of metric tensors and their properties
  • Familiarity with index notation and transformations
  • Basic knowledge of differential geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of symmetric and antisymmetric tensors
  • Learn about the transformation laws for connections in differential geometry
  • Explore the implications of dummy indices in tensor expressions
  • Review the "10 Commandments of Index Expressions" for common pitfalls in tensor calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in mathematics and physics, particularly those working with tensor calculus, differential geometry, and general relativity, will benefit from this discussion.

phyTens
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Following a book "Introducing Einstein's Relativity" by Ray d'Inverno, I came across this problem (6.16):
Show directly that $$\Gamma^a_{bc}=\frac{1}{2}g^{ad}(\partial_b g_{dc}+\partial_c g_{db}-\partial_d g_{bc})$$ transforms like a connection.
Relevant Equations
The definition of ##\Gamma^a_{bc}## given above, and the usual rules for transforming tensors, i. e. $$g'^{ab}=\frac{\partial x'^a}{\partial x^c}\frac{\partial x'^b}{\partial x^d}g^{cd}$$

A useful result is also
$$\partial'_b g'_{dc}=\frac{\partial x^e}{\partial x'^b} \frac{\partial x^f}{\partial x'^c} \frac{\partial x^g}{\partial x'^d}\partial_e g_{gf}+\frac{\partial x^e}{\partial x'^b}\frac{\partial}{\partial x^e}\left (\frac{\partial x^g}{\partial x'^d}\frac{\partial x^f}{\partial x'^c}\right ) g_{gf}$$
I simply just wrote down the definition of ##\Gamma'^a_{bc}##, and inserted the transformations of ##g'^{ad}##, ##g'_{dc,b}##, and the like terms. After some rearranging and cancelling out,

$$\Gamma'^a_{bc}=\frac{\partial x'^a}{\partial x^e}\frac{\partial x^f}{\partial x'^b}\frac{\partial x^g}{\partial x'^c}\Gamma^e_{fg}+\frac{\partial x'^a}{\partial x^e}\frac{\partial^2 x^e}{\partial x'^b\,\partial x'^c}+\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial x'^a}{\partial x^e}\frac{\partial x'^d}{\partial x^h}g^{eh}g_{hg}\left(\frac{\partial^2 x^h}{\partial x'^c\,\partial x'^d}\frac{\partial x^g}{\partial x'^b}-\frac{\partial x^h}{\partial x'^b}\frac{\partial^2 x^g}{\partial x'^c\,\partial x'^d} \right )$$

The first two terms correspond to the usual transformation law for connections, hence the third term should vanish. If my calculations until this point are correct, the original problem reduces to proving that the following expression reduces to zero:
$$\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial x'^a}{\partial x^e}\frac{\partial x'^d}{\partial x^h}g^{eh}g_{hg}\left(\frac{\partial^2 x^h}{\partial x'^c\,\partial x'^d}\frac{\partial x^g}{\partial x'^b}-\frac{\partial x^h}{\partial x'^b}\frac{\partial^2 x^g}{\partial x'^c\,\partial x'^d} \right )$$

However, I couldn't show this, despite making lots of attempts. One of more promising attempts is swapping the dummy indices ##g## and ##h## in the second term, and arriving at
$$\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial x'^a}{\partial x^e}\frac{\partial x^g}{\partial x'^b}\frac{\partial^2 x^h}{\partial x'^c\, \partial x'^d}\left( \frac{\partial x'^d}{\partial x^h}g^{eh}-\frac{\partial x'^d}{\partial x^g}g^{eg}\right )$$
which would have to be proved to be equal to zero.

Unfortunately, I only know the basics of tensors, and don't know how such equation could be proved. As such, I am kindly asking you to post some insight on how such a problem could be tackled. Of course, I have almost certainly already made some errors, and I would be happy if you'd pointed that out as well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the fact that the metric is symmetric.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
I used this fact to derive the last expression in the post, but I haven't been able to go much further. Could you be more specific of where to apply this fact?
 
In the last expression, note that ##g## and ##h## are dummy indices, so the two terms in the parentheses are equal.

Your last bit of work wasn't necessary though. In the earlier line, you had this factor
$$\left(\frac{\partial x^g}{\partial x'^b}\frac{\partial^2 x^h}{\partial x'^c\,\partial x'^d}-\frac{\partial x^h}{\partial x'^b}\frac{\partial^2 x^g}{\partial x'^c\,\partial x'^d} \right ),$$ which I rearranged slightly to make its antisymmetry with respect to the indices ##g## and ##h## obvious. Since your multiplying it by ##g_{hg}##, which is symmetric, the product will vanish.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
vela said:
Since your multiplying it by ghg, which is symmetric, the product will vanish.
Oh, thank you!

vela said:
In the last expression, note that g and h are dummy indices, so the two terms in the parentheses are equal.
I really wanted to use this fact, but I was worried because ##g## and ##h## also show up in the factor before the difference as well. Is this not a problem when cancelling out the terms in the difference?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark and phyTens

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K