How to size an orifice on a vent line

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on sizing an orifice for a 3/4" vent line that vents gaseous nitrogen at pressures exceeding 1500 psig, while the vent stones are rated for only 300 psig. The user seeks formulas for calculating mass flow rate with choked flow and flow coefficient, referencing specific equations from NASA and FNW Valve. The user expresses difficulty in applying these equations effectively to achieve the desired flow rate limitation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of choked flow principles
  • Familiarity with mass flow rate calculations
  • Knowledge of flow coefficient (Cv) equations
  • Basic concepts of dynamic pressure
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of the mass flow rate equation for choked flow in gas systems
  • Study the flow coefficient (Cv) calculations for orifice sizing
  • Explore dynamic pressure equations and their relevance in vent line applications
  • Investigate safety measures for high-pressure gas venting systems
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, safety professionals, and technicians involved in high-pressure gas systems, particularly those working with vent line design and orifice sizing for pressure regulation.

steves1080
Messages
64
Reaction score
1
I would like to install a vent stone on a 3/4" vent line. The line vents upwards of 1500 psig of stored gasous nitrogen in under 1 second. The vent stones are only rated for 300 psig, so I'd like to add an orifice just upstream to limit the exit flow rate to a point where it can handle the pressures from venting the GN2. What are useful formulas for this application? I was thinking perhaps the equation for mass flow rate with choked flow (http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/airplane/mflchk.html), and also the equation for flow coefficient (http://www.fnwvalve.com/FNWValve/assets/images/PDFs/FNW/tech_AboutCv.pdf). Then I started thinking about the equation for dynamic pressure (http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/airplane/dynpress.html), but I am struggling with applying these equations to get the information I need. Either I am not using the right approach, or I am not using these correctly.

Thanks for any insight!

-Mike
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
27K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
13K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
19K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K