How to Solve Exponential Equations with Different Bases?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nae99
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
24 replies · 5K views
nae99
Messages
129
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



4(3^2x+1) + 17(3^x) - 7 = 0


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



4 + 17 (3^2x+1+x) - 7 = 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am assuming your problem reads:

4(32x+1) + 17(3x) - 7 = 0

In which case remember that am+n=aman and amn = (am)n.

So after you expand out the first term you can use a substitution to solve for x such as y=3x.
 
rock.freak667 said:
I am assuming your problem reads:

4(32x+1) + 17(3x) - 7 = 0

In which case remember that am+n=aman and amn = (am)n.

So after you expand out the first term you can use a substitution to solve for x such as y=3x.

and how will i expand it...becaues i don't know how to
 
nae99 said:
and how will i expand it...becaues i don't know how to

Take the first term 4(32x+1) using the first rule I posted with am+n=aman, how can you rewrite 32x+1 as?
 
rock.freak667 said:
Take the first term 4(32x+1) using the first rule I posted with am+n=aman, how can you rewrite 32x+1 as?

so is it (3^2x)(3^1)
 
Yes. So following up on what rock.freak said, you will have

4(3)(32x)+17(3x)-7=0

So now, you will substitute y=3x. After that, you should be able to solve it.
 
Ivan92 said:
Yes. So following up on what rock.freak said, you will have

4(3)(32x)+17(3x)-7=0

So now, you will substitute y=3x. After that, you should be able to solve it.

i have no idea what to do next
 
SammyS said:
32x = (3x)2

& 4(3) = 12

Now, does Ivan's suggestion make more sense to you?

4(3)(3^2x)+17(3x)-7=0

32x = (3x)2

& 4(3) = 12
so after that would it be something like this:

12 + (3^x)^2 + 17(3x)-7=0
 
You are not to add 12 but multiply it to the first term. I also noticed that your notation is a bit wrong. Your equation shouldould look like this:

12(3x)2+17(3x)-7=0

Then do what rocky said earlier, which is y=3x. Then you should be able to see what you are to do next.
 
Ivan92 said:
You are not to add 12 but multiply it to the first term. I also noticed that your notation is a bit wrong. Your equation shouldould look like this:

12(3x)2+17(3x)-7=0

Then do what rocky said earlier, which is y=3x. Then you should be able to see what you are to do next.

then
12*17(3x)-7=0
 
No, you would multiply 12 to the (3x)2.

Where ever you see 3x you substitute in y. When you do that, you should form a quadratic equation. Then do what is necessary to solve it.

12(3x)2+17(3x)-7=0

Here is the equation again.
 
Ivan92 said:
No, you would multiply 12 to the (3x)2.

Where ever you see 3x you substitute in y. When you do that, you should form a quadratic equation. Then do what is necessary to solve it.

12(3x)2+17(3x)-7=0

Here is the equation again.

so should it be this
(36x)2 + (51x)-7=0


which would be
36x^2 + 51x - 7=0
 
You just did a common algebraic error:

a(bx) [itex]\neq[/itex](ab)x

Just simply put in y for where ever you see 3x. Then do what I told you before.
 
Ivan92 said:
You just did a common algebraic error:

a(bx) [itex]\neq[/itex](ab)x

Just simply put in y for where ever you see 3x. Then do what I told you before.

12(3x)2+17(3x)-7=0

so are you saying i should do this:

12(y)2+17(y)-7=0
 
Ivan92 said:
No, you would multiply 12 to the (3x)2.

Where ever you see 3x you substitute in y. When you do that, you should form a quadratic equation. Then do what is necessary to solve it.

12(3x)2+17(3x)-7=0

See this equation as corrected by Ivan:

[tex]12(3^x)^2+17(3^x)-7=0[/tex]

Everyplace you see [itex]3^x[/itex] in the equation, replace it with [itex]y\,.[/itex]

You should obtain a quadratic equation, but the variable is y instead of the usual x which you are more accustomed to.

The expression on the left hand side of your new equation can be factored, which should lead to a solution. Alternatively, you should be able to solve it using the quadratic formula.

Added in Edit:

I see you got the quadratic equation while I was entering my post. I'm a slow typist.
 
SammyS said:
See this equation as corrected by Ivan:

[tex]12(3^x)^2+17(3^x)-7=0[/tex]

Everyplace you see [itex]3^x[/itex] in the equation, replace it with [itex]y\,.[/itex]

You should obtain a quadratic equation, but the variable is y instead of the usual x which you are more accustomed to.

The expression on the left hand side of your new equation can be factored, which should lead to a solution. Alternatively, you should be able to solve it using the quadratic formula.

ok understand now, so i would be

12y^2+17y-7=0
 
Yep. So now all you would have to do now is solve for y. Then when you solve for y, replace y with 3x then solve for x.
 
Ivan92 said:
Yep. So now all you would have to do now is solve for y. Then when you solve for y, replace y with 3x then solve for x.

i solve foe y but how should i replace it with 3x

for eg. y= 1.75
would it then be
3x=1.75
 
Yes, exactly and then use logs to solve it.
 
BloodyFrozen said:
Yes, exactly and then use logs to solve it.

so is it
x= log3 1.75
 
SammyS said:
Not quite.

I get two solutions for y.

One of them is -7/4 which is equal to -1.75.

What's the other solution?

the other solution is y=0.333
 
SammyS said:
Actually it's y = 1/3, which is good, because that can be written as 3-1.

So, all you have to do for this solution to y is to solve: [itex]3^x = 3^{-1}\,.[/itex]

Can you solve that for x?

yes
recall: a^m = a^n, m=n

[itex]3^x = 3^{-1}\,.[/itex]
then x= -1