MHB How to Solve the Trigonometric Equation cos5x+cosx=cos6x?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Solve $cos5x+cosx=cos6x$ in the interval $0<x<2\pi$.

Without thinking much, I do the following:
$2cos3xcos2x=cos6x$
Now, even if I still refuse to devise a plan but blindly applying the trig formula, I get:
$2cos3xcos2x=cos^23x-sin^23x$

Hmm, clearly this isn't going to bring me to any credible output.:(

But questions like this often yield the cases where:
1. zero=zero
2. 1 = 1

Thus, without actually solving it, I can say that
$x=\frac{\pi}{4}, \frac{\pi}{3}, and \frac{3\pi}{4}$ in the interval $0<x<2\pi$. I must have left out some other values. That is for sure.

That is my thought.

Despite my having said this, I tried to expand it and get down to all terms involving only $cos^nx$ and/or $sin^nx$

$2cos3xcos2x=cos^23x-sin^23x$
$2(4cos^3x-3cosx)(2cos^2x-1)=(4cos^3x-3cosx)^2-(3sinx-4sin^3x)^2$
Ah! This is a move in the wrong direction.

Could someone help me, please?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you use the multiple angle formulae for $\cos(5x)$ and $\cos(6x)$ and write $c=\cos x$ then the equation becomes $32c^6-16c^5-48c^4+20c^3+18c^2-6c-1=0.$ That factorises as $(2c-1)(2c^2-1)(8c^3-8c-1)=0.$

The first factor $2c-1$ gives the equation $\cos x=1/2$, corresponding to the solutions $x=\pi/3$ and $x=5\pi/3$.

The second factor $2c^2-1$ gives the equation $\cos x=\pm1/\sqrt2$, corresponding to the solutions $x=\pi/4$, $x=3\pi/4$, $x=5\pi/4$ and $x=7\pi/4$.

But the third factor $8c^3-8c-1$ look completely intractable to me. The cubic equation $8c^3-8c-1=0$ has three real roots. One root is greater than 1 and so does not correspond to any values of $\cos x.$ The other two roots are negative, and as far as I can see do not correspond to any recognisable values of $x.$
 
Last edited:
Using Euler's identity $\displaystyle \cos x = \frac{e^{i x}+ e^{- i x}}{2}$ the trigonometric equation becomes...

$\displaystyle e^{5 i x} + e^{-5 i x}+ e^{i x} + e^{- i x}= e^{i 6 x} + e^{ -6 i x}$ (1)

... and setting $\displaystyle e^{i x}= \xi$ is some steps we arrive to write...

$\displaystyle \xi^{12} -\xi^{11}- \xi^{7} - \xi^{5} - \xi +1= (\xi^{2}-\xi+1)\ (\xi^{4}+1)\ (\xi^{6}-\xi^{4} -\xi^{3}-\xi^{2}+1)=0$ (2)

Because is $\displaystyle x=-i\ \ln \xi$ the solution of (1) will be derived from the solution of (2) which lie on the unit circle. The factor $\displaystyle \xi^{2} - \xi +1$ conducts us to the solutions $\displaystyle x=\pm \frac{\pi}{3}$. The factor $\displaystyle \xi^{4}+1$ conducts us to the solutions $\displaystyle x= (2n+1)\ \frac{\pi}{4}$.The last factor $\displaystyle \xi^{6} -\xi^{4} -\xi^{3}-\xi^{2}+1$ is of course less 'comfortable' but its numerical solution shows that four of its complex roots lie on the unit circle...

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=x^6-x^4-x^3-x^2+1=0

... and are in the second and third quadrants...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top